Burris Fullfield II

[JOsdieck]

I've read under another topic that some of you think that the Full Field II can't handle the pounding from the bigger guns? I'm new to rifles. How do you think it would handle on a 7mm rem mag? Is this a big caliber? I like the Full field II, and the idea of having balistic plex, but if you don't think it will work out, then I might go with a Leupold vx-II. Looking through both of them, I actually liked the Burris better (and it's cheaper), but I supose a rifle scope that won't hold zero would be completely useless. Anybody have any input about a full field II on a 7 mm rem mag.

 

really appreciate advice! Thanks!

 

-Joe

[WHT_MTNMAN]

I don't know anything about Burris, GO NIKON

[JOsdieck]

I see you're working hard on the tutorial as well...

[Benbrown]

I have a couple of older Burris scopes on light rifles (a 7mm-08 "youth rifle" and .280 Remington Mountain rifle) and they have held up well under lots of ammo testing and hunting. They are primarily used by my step-son and my grandchildren and therefore are not babied, as it were. I also had a Burris spotting scope that I used hard for about ten years before giving it to my brother while hunting antelope last year.

 

I have no experience with the Fullfield II, but my brother put one on his Browning .270 WSM last year and has used it on one antelope hunt and to cull quite a few Texas whitetails, as well as putting down a number of feral goats. He says that it has held its zero through five or six boxes of shells. He really likes the ballistic plex reticle. Every brand has a lemon once in a while, but I have heard of only one problem with a Burris scope and they replaced it free of charge without a whimper.

[JOsdieck]

Thanks Ben, appreciate the input!