KGAINES Report post Posted March 8, 2008 http://news.aol.com/story/_a/wolverine-rar...S00010000000001 I don't care one way or another on this, but I wonder how many sightings were by hunters. I would bet that hunters spend way more time in the field than all of these people, and if the only people seeing these things are the people from the center for biological diversity, who's to say that it wasn't planted there to create a huge (endangered species) issue. I truly hope it's really a native species, but if they find it isn't and was planted, then these groups need to be squashed, but then again the "they" that will be doing the testing and research would be in on it. Next will be the elusive Shasta Musk ox, or the Chino Valley Cheetah, the Colorado River Humpback Chub, oh wait that one is real. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
4Falls Report post Posted March 8, 2008 Thats how these groups base their data.... They drove around in their volvo all morning on saturday and didnt see a single coyote? Jeez something must be done to protect the coyotes! I was watching a wildlife show with my daughters about a year ago. The host was that dork Jack Hanna from the SD Zoo. He concluded that cougars need to be protected in the wild because HE had never seen one. These are the SO-CALLED experts. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
.270 Report post Posted March 18, 2008 i saw a wolverine in colorado 22 years ago and they weren't supposed to be there. but then again, i did see a talkin' javelina too. so maybe i ain't a reliable source. Lark. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
