GameHauler Report post Posted February 24, 2008 Very impressive Tony!!! Did you memorize word for word the hunting regs? "A wise man does not know everything, A wise man knows where to find the answer to everything" Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Outdoor Writer Report post Posted February 24, 2008 Very impressive Tony!!! Did you memorize word for word the hunting regs? "A wise man does not know everything, A wise man knows where to find the answer to everything" Bingo, Mike! -TONY Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Redman Report post Posted February 24, 2008 As a FYI, here are some laws currently on the books that ban baiting for big game. Wyoming: Section 14. Baiting of Big Game Animals Prohibited except by Qualified Persons. Any legally blind person, person confined to a wheelchair or any person hunting with a license issued pursuant to W. S. §23-1-705 (j) may place a bait for big game or take a big game animal by the use of bait. Montana: Prohibited Methods of Taking: It is illegal for anyone to hunt or attempt to hunt any game animal or game bird: • by the aid or with the use of any set gun, jacklight, spotlight or other artificial light, trap, snare, salt lick, or bait, MCA 87-3-101. Baiting shall mean the placing, exposing, depositing, distributing, or scattering of corn, wheat, or other grain or food sources so as to constitute a lure or attraction. Colorado: 21. Use dogs or bait to hunt bears, deer, elk, pronghorn or moose. Bait means to put, expose, distribute or scatter salt, minerals, grain, animal parts or other food as an attraction for big game. Scent sticks that smell like food are illegal for bears. New Mexico: • Take or attempt to take game mammals or game birds over ground baited with any material or scent distributed there to entice the animals, except quail or turkey on private land. Scent-masking agents may be used on one’s person, but not to attract big game. -TONY Tony, What? You mean to tell me that other states don't allow bating? Holly molly I thought the Arizona Game and Fish was really stepping away from the norm if it was going to ban baiting. The states you mentioned seem to be pretty good company... Thanks for the post. Redman Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wklman Report post Posted February 24, 2008 Hey Redman don't be bringing common sense into this discussion you might throw some of these guys off..... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DesertBull Report post Posted February 24, 2008 As a FYI, here are some laws currently on the books that ban baiting for big game. Wyoming: Section 14. Baiting of Big Game Animals Prohibited except by Qualified Persons. Any legally blind person, person confined to a wheelchair or any person hunting with a license issued pursuant to W. S. §23-1-705 (j) may place a bait for big game or take a big game animal by the use of bait. Montana: Prohibited Methods of Taking: It is illegal for anyone to hunt or attempt to hunt any game animal or game bird: • by the aid or with the use of any set gun, jacklight, spotlight or other artificial light, trap, snare, salt lick, or bait, MCA 87-3-101. Baiting shall mean the placing, exposing, depositing, distributing, or scattering of corn, wheat, or other grain or food sources so as to constitute a lure or attraction. Colorado: 21. Use dogs or bait to hunt bears, deer, elk, pronghorn or moose. Bait means to put, expose, distribute or scatter salt, minerals, grain, animal parts or other food as an attraction for big game. Scent sticks that smell like food are illegal for bears. New Mexico: • Take or attempt to take game mammals or game birds over ground baited with any material or scent distributed there to entice the animals, except quail or turkey on private land. Scent-masking agents may be used on one’s person, but not to attract big game. -TONY Tony, What? You mean to tell me that other states don't allow bating? Holly molly I thought the Arizona Game and Fish was really stepping away from the norm if it was going to ban baiting. The states you mentioned seem to be pretty good company... Thanks for the post. Redman It was the Antis that pushed for banning baiting AND USE OF HOUNDS in Colorado and Oregon, not hunters. If you don't think the use of dogs will the next thing they go after here, once the baiting is taken away, you are not paying attention. These people are not stupid, they know that they cannot get away with the banning of all hunting, but they can take a little bit away every year until our numbers eventually dry up and die. WAKE UP! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Redman Report post Posted February 24, 2008 It was the Antis that pushed for banning baiting AND USE OF HOUNDS in Colorado and Oregon, not hunters. If you don't think the use of dogs will the next thing they go after here, once the baiting is taken away, you are not paying attention. These people are not stupid, they know that they cannot get away with the banning of all hunting, but they can take a little bit away every year until our numbers eventually dry up and die. WAKE UP! Your argument as you stated is a red herring. The rule change in AZ is due to the Game and Fish, not antis. I am neutral on this subject, I guess it's because I have never done it. I thought about it, and was going to do it this year because the great success people are having...... Redman Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Outdoor Writer Report post Posted February 24, 2008 It was the Antis that pushed for banning baiting AND USE OF HOUNDS in Colorado and Oregon, not hunters. If you don't think the use of dogs will the next thing they go after here, once the baiting is taken away, you are not paying attention. These people are not stupid, they know that they cannot get away with the banning of all hunting, but they can take a little bit away every year until our numbers eventually dry up and die. WAKE UP! Im quite aware of what the Colorado ballot measure involved since I did extensive coverage of it before and after it was passed. I even did an interview of the Colorado bear biologist AND AVID HUNTER Tom Beck for an article in Rocky Mt. Game & Fish magazine. You might recall he had written an article for Outdoor Life in which he stated his support of the ban. Neither of those initiatives the antis pushed and got passed mentioned using bait for OTHER big game. They specially addressed the issues noted below. -TONY 1992 Colorado prohibit spring, bait, and hound hunting of black bears Amendment 10 Approved 70% 30% 1994 Oregon ban bear baiting and hound hunting of mountain lions Measure 18 Approved 52% 48% Here's some interesting after-the-fact analysis: Political Environment Bear hunting has become a national issue for animal rights activists. Animal rights activists were successful in bringing a referendum (Amendment 10) to the statewide ballot in Colorado in 1992 which prohibited certain types of bear hunting. The referendum was supported by 70% of the voters (Loker & Decker, 1995). **** Opponents of bait hunting for bears claim it is unfair and inconsistent with the principle of "fair chase" applied to other game species (Beck et al. 1994). The Idaho Department of Fish and Game (1992) found that only 29% of survey respondents who said they hunted and only 8 % of nonhunters approved of hunting bears with bait. There apparently was little difference in disapproval for hunting bears with bait or dogs in Idaho. As with dog hunting, 70% of survey respondents expressed opposition to hunting black bears with bait in Colorado (Standage Accureach, Inc. and Ciruli Associates, Inc. 1991). AND.. a few more states with laws against baiting big-game animals: California 257.5. Prohibition Against Taking Resident Game Birds and Mammals by the Aid of Bait. Except as otherwise provided in these regulations or in the Fish and Game Code, resident game birds and mammals may not be taken within 400 yards of any baited area. (a) Definition of Baited Area. As used in this regulation, “baited area” shall mean any area where shelled, shucked or unshucked corn, wheat or other grains, salt, or other feed whatsoever capable of luring, attracting, or enticing such birds or mammals is directly or indirectly placed, exposed, deposited, distributed, or scattered, and such area shall remain a baited area for ten days following complete removal of all such corn, wheat or other grains, salt, or other feed. Exceptions: (1) The taking of domestically reared and released game birds on licensed pheasant clubs and other licensed game bird clubs; General Provisions And Definitions (2) The taking of resident game birds and mammals on or over standing crops, flooded standing crops (including aquatics), flooded harvested croplands, grain crops properly shocked on the field where grown, or grains found scattered solely as the result of normal agricultural planting or harvesting; (3) The taking of resident game birds and mammals on or over any lands where shelled, shucked or unshucked corn, wheat or other grain, salt, or other feed have been distributed or scattered as the result of bona fide agricultural operations or procedures, or as a result of manipulation of a crop or other feed on the land where grown for wildlife management purposes: provided that manipulation for wildlife management purposes does not include the distributing or scattering of grain or other feed once it has been removed from or stored on the field where grown. Alaska 5 AAC 92.230. Feeding of game Except under the terms of a permit issued by the department, a person may not intentionally feed a moose, deer, elk, bear, wolf, coyote, fox, or wolverine, or negligently leave human food, animal food, or garbage in a manner that attracts these animals. However, this prohibition does not apply to use of bait for trapping furbearers or hunting black bears, wolf, fox, or wolverine under 5 AAC 84 - 5 AAC 92. Wisconsin No person may place, use or hunt over bait or feed material for the purpose of hunting any wild animals (except deer as provided below and for bear, see Wisconsin Bear Hunting Regulations) unless authorized by a special permit or license issued by the department. Scents: Scent may be used for hunting deer or other wild animals, but the scent may not be placed or deposited in a manner that it is accessible for consumption by deer, and scents shall be removed daily at the end of hunting hours established for deer. However, two ounces or less of scent may be placed, used or deposited in any manner for hunting game and does not need to be removed daily at the end of hunting hours. Natural Vegetation and Plantings: You may hunt with the aid of material deposited by natural vegetation or material found solely as a result of normal agricultural or gardening practices, or with the aid of crops planted and left standing as wildlife food plots. South Dakota It is illegal: To use salt blocks, licks or bait station to attract big game. “Bait station” is a place where edible foodstuffs or minerals are placed or maintained as an attractant to game animals. Use of scent alone does not constitute a bait station. Massachusetts (f) A person shall not make, set, or use any bait, decoy, torchlight or spotlight, trap, or other like device for the purpose of attracting, ensnaring, taking, injuring, or killing a deer, nor hunt by baiting or within any baited area, nor hunt, drive, worry, or disturb any deer with or by the aid of any noise-making device, provided that nothing in 321 CMR 3.02(4)(f) shall be deemed to prohibit the use of scents or of deer antlers or replicas thereof or of grunt tubes as callers or attractants by persons otherwise lawfully hunting deer. Bait means any natural or artificial substance, including but not restricted to, shucked or unshucked corn, wheat or other grains, hay, silage, apples or other fruits or vegetables, and salt or other chemical compounds of a like nature which may be fed upon, ingested by or which otherwise constitute a nutritive attraction or enticement to deer. Baited area means any area where baiting has taken place and such area shall remain a baited area for the period from ten days prior to the opening of the exclusive archery season as provided in 321 CMR 3.02(4)(2. to 12:00 P.M. on the day following the close of the exclusive primitive firearms season as provided in 321 CMR 3.02(4)(4., all dates inclusive. Kentucky Bait: a substance composed of grains, minerals, salt, fruits, vegetables, hay or any other food materials, whether natural or manufactured, which may lure, entice or attract wildlife. Baiting: to place, deposit, tend, distribute or scatter bait. 12. A person shall not distribute or place bait, hunt over bait or otherwise participate in baiting wildlife on a wildlife management area. And... Baiting is prohibited on state parks. Baiting is also prohibited in: GREEN RIVER STATE FOREST Henderson County JEFFERSON NATIONAL FOREST Letcher & Pike cos. KENTENIA STATE FOREST Harlan County KENTUCKY RIDGE STATE FOREST Bell County TYGARTS STATE FOREST Carter County New York Baiting—It is illegal to hunt with the aid of bait, or over any baited area when hunting big game, upland game birds, turkey or waterfowl. Artificial Lights—It is illegal to hunt deer This is just one that I found a bit humorous: Oregon 2. Shooting at wild animals or wild birds while they are on any utility line, pole, its crossarm or insulator is prohibited. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DesertBull Report post Posted February 24, 2008 The rule change in AZ is due to the Game and Fish, not antis. Redman It's getting harder and harder to tell the difference between the two. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GRONG Report post Posted February 27, 2008 A local GW called me about a week ago and we talked for a while. I mentioned this very thread and he said he'd hadn't heard of any talk about banning baits but he's just a warden, usually the last to know, but he did see this topic. He did say that unit 7 is going to an archery draw cause of the bulls*#t 20% rule mentioned earlier in this topic. He also mentioned that unit 8 & 9 I believe were gonna be opened for Jan archery deer. I said well why not open them all up, like 6A? He said that it's cause usually there are road closures that most of the unit wouldn't be able to hunt it anyway. I said I could drive a quad or truck (if I dared) clear around, in a roundabout way, on a road thats not closed into the same country that the road is closed from on the other end, usually in the higher elevations. Now his reasoning didn't make much sense to me, but hey that's the G&F's reasoning. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Coues 'n' Sheep Report post Posted February 27, 2008 A local GW called me about a week ago and we talked for a while. I mentioned this very thread and he said he'd hadn't heard of any talk about banning baits but he's just a warden, usually the last to know, but he did see this topic. He did say that unit 7 is going to an archery draw cause of the bulls*#t 20% rule mentioned earlier in this topic. He also mentioned that unit 8 & 9 I believe were gonna be opened for Jan archery deer. I said well why not open them all up, like 6A? He said that it's cause usually there are road closures that most of the unit wouldn't be able to hunt it anyway. I said I could drive a quad or truck (if I dared) clear around, in a roundabout way, on a road thats not closed into the same country that the road is closed from on the other end, usually in the higher elevations. Now his reasoning didn't make much sense to me, but hey that's the G&F's reasoning. I spoke at great length to a WM in the field this weekend and, come to find out, he is one of the four AZGF guys that are writing the new rule.... The NEW RULE will be very much like the bear baiting rule, but more broad. Water and Salt will still be ok..... However, any other bait substance placed for the purpose of hunting or taking any big game will be Illegal. Probably as soon as Jan. 2009 and there is no stopping this new rule. Done deal, end of story, it will not be up for any discussion. FYI, also, 2008 Dec. archery is gone for atleast 3 years in unit 22... according to the stats in 2007 rifle and archery harvests in unit 22 were at 150 each. CnS Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Huntn coues Report post Posted February 27, 2008 Yup That pretty well sums it up. I was in on that conversation over the weekend with my girls and Gino and got alot of info on this subject. But that's what the man said done deal! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Huntn coues Report post Posted February 27, 2008 I will also like to add that this was one of the nicest G/F guy's I have talked with in a while. He answered all off my questions and my daughters questions that we asked. We had a very pleasant time shooting the bull with him and he also made a VERY good impression with my girls. And no I am not brown nosing in hopes of getting a tag this year. Troy Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DesertBull Report post Posted February 27, 2008 FYI, also, 2008 Dec. archery is gone for atleast 3 years in unit 22... according to the stats in 2007 rifle and archery harvests in unit 22 were at 150 each. CnS Bull poop. 150 archery kills in ONE UNIT? What was that Mark Twain said about statistics? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Coues 'n' Sheep Report post Posted February 27, 2008 FYI, also, 2008 Dec. archery is gone for atleast 3 years in unit 22... according to the stats in 2007 rifle and archery harvests in unit 22 were at 150 each. CnS Bull poop. 150 archery kills in ONE UNIT? What was that Mark Twain said about statistics? That is what the man said.... 150 and that would be up from about 90 in 2006 if I'm not mistaken! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Coues 'n' Sheep Report post Posted February 27, 2008 FYI, also, 2008 Dec. archery is gone for atleast 3 years in unit 22... according to the stats in 2007 rifle and archery harvests in unit 22 were at 150 each. CnS Bull poop. 150 archery kills in ONE UNIT? What was that Mark Twain said about statistics? That is what the man said.... 150 and that would be up from about 90 in 2006 if I'm not mistaken! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites