firstcoueswas80 Report post Posted September 5, 2008 Wow. What unit did those trophies come from?! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
tjhunt2 Report post Posted September 5, 2008 This is what attracks my game. Who needs salt and feed. But those who want to use salt and feed should be able to use it. This is AMERICA. Don't change people's success at hunting. INKPAD13 Casey, WOW is right! My eyes are getting older but I can still see that the one on the right is flatter and the one head light isn't even on. What year is she? Could you please edit the bumper accesseries so we could see the rest of her. Is it a jeep? I was talking about the fender being flatter, sorry for not clearing that one up right away. TJ Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Kaffer62 Report post Posted September 5, 2008 Thats a nice truck.... Even nicer are the girls.... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
LAR DOG Report post Posted September 5, 2008 This is what attracks my game. Who needs salt and feed. But those who want to use salt and feed should be able to use it. This is AMERICA. Don't change people's success at hunting. INKPAD13 Casey, WOW is right! My eyes are getting older but I can still see that the one on the right is flatter and the one head light isn't even on. What year is she? Could you please edit the bumper accesseries so we could see the rest of her. Is it a jeep? I was talking about the fender being flatter, sorry for not clearing that one up right away. TJ It's not a jeep It's a 1947 Dodge Powerwagon. But the accessories are a little newer. She's been with me for a while. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Kaffer62 Report post Posted September 5, 2008 Can we get more pics? Girls or Dodge? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CouesWhitetail Report post Posted September 5, 2008 Hey guys, let's stick to the salt and feed topic...... You can email each other pictures of women if you want. It's not really related to this discussion. Thanks. Amanda Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dobbs07 Report post Posted September 5, 2008 I'm just trying to find out if there is any new information on this, or where exactly we are at with this issue.... anyone have any updates? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GHOSTLUVR Report post Posted September 5, 2008 I'm just trying to find out if there is any new information on this, or where exactly we are at with this issue.... anyone have any updates? Its been a couple months, but I spoke with a local GFD officer that is assisting in writing this rule (I will keep his name ananomous to protect him! ) He stated that the wording, "Anything placed in a manner to attract wildlife....." was to broad to allow for fair enforcement. He told me that, as you guys have said, it would be near impossible to enforce the current mineral sites. They are not planning to enforce sites that you have already established as long as no new attractant is added! Looks like this could stall the rule until 2010. Not sure how accurate this is, but, its a glimmer of hope!!!!!!!! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest 300ultramag. Report post Posted September 17, 2008 TTT Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest 300ultramag. Report post Posted September 18, 2008 ha ha u guys got yelled at.............. u couple o' dirt bags keep ur filth off of the forum oh yeah and I believe Wnklman hunts in MN. DON'T YOU? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
bowhunter4life Report post Posted November 24, 2008 Some of you game and fish nuts need to read the new artical 3 for baiting, looks like g-f is going to push it through casa grand meeting on the 5th of dec. may be a topic of chose! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Red Rabbit Report post Posted November 24, 2008 Do you have a link to a copy of the change to article 3? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wardsoutfitters Report post Posted November 26, 2008 I attended a open meeting with Bob Hernbrode in tucson tonight, he said the rule as it is now will read. " The use of any digestable or non digestable substance used to attract animals " We discussed this matter for over an hour. If you would like more information about what was discussed please feel free to call me 520-384-3351 or 520-404-5114 Steven Ward Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GameHauler Report post Posted November 26, 2008 " The use of any digestable or non digestable substance used to attract animals " mad.gif The way that reads it would include salt, water, calls, scrapelines, natural feed areas.ect. It is already illegal to bait Bear and migratory birds so does that mean waterfowl hunters could no longer us calls and decoys? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
azpackhorse Report post Posted November 26, 2008 I am curious to see if it reads "you cannot take animals using these" or if it's just plain "you cannot use these" for anything, even in the nonhunting situations. I guess we will see Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
