Game & Fish Commission meeting webcam archives?

[Ohthatguy]

Does anyone know if these are available? I can't find anything on the GnF site.

Thx,

[1uglydude]

Does anyone know if these are available? I can't find anything on the GnF site.

Thx,

 

Nope. They are one of the few government entities that doesn't seem to think it is important make them available. You either get it live, or you get the bare bones meeting minutes three months after the fact. It wouldn't be hard to have them archived on YouTube, so they must have their reasons.

[Ohthatguy]

 

Does anyone know if these are available? I can't find anything on the GnF site.

Thx,

 

Nope. They are one of the few government entities that doesn't seem to think it is important make them available. You either get it live, or you get the bare bones meeting minutes three months after the fact. It wouldn't be hard to have them archived on YouTube, so they must have their reasons.

 

Well then, that leads to question #2. Would it be a problem to record it and post a link to it? I recorded some portions of it and actually found it quite interesting. Especially the vote at the end for the trail cams. "Motion, second, against, for, withdrawn.." Huh?

[1uglydude]

 

 

Does anyone know if these are available? I can't find anything on the GnF site.

Thx,

 

Nope. They are one of the few government entities that doesn't seem to think it is important make them available. You either get it live, or you get the bare bones meeting minutes three months after the fact. It wouldn't be hard to have them archived on YouTube, so they must have their reasons.

 

Well then, that leads to question #2. Would it be a problem to record it and post a link to it? I recorded some portions of it and actually found it quite interesting. Especially the vote at the end for the trail cams. "Motion, second, against, for, withdrawn.." Huh?

 

 

It was a public meeting. Post it up.

 

You're describing the motion process under Roberts Rules of Parliamentary Procedure. It sounds confusing in person, but there is a method to it. Sometimes the Commission itself has a hard time keeping it straight...one reason they have an attorney on hand.

[Ohthatguy]

 

 

 

Does anyone know if these are available? I can't find anything on the GnF site.

Thx,

 

Nope. They are one of the few government entities that doesn't seem to think it is important make them available. You either get it live, or you get the bare bones meeting minutes three months after the fact. It wouldn't be hard to have them archived on YouTube, so they must have their reasons.

 

Well then, that leads to question #2. Would it be a problem to record it and post a link to it? I recorded some portions of it and actually found it quite interesting. Especially the vote at the end for the trail cams. "Motion, second, against, for, withdrawn.." Huh?

 

 

It was a public meeting. Post it up.

 

You're describing the motion process under Roberts Rules of Parliamentary Procedure. It sounds confusing in person, but there is a method to it. Sometimes the Commission itself has a hard time keeping it straight...one reason they have an attorney on hand.

I understand the process and jargon but I thought they had three in favor and one against before it all fell apart. However after watching it again, maybe the second was not by Commissioner Ammons but rather by Commissioner Brake. Since Commissioner sparks was not present at the prior meeting which ended in a 2-2 vote, once he voted no, I guess they knew it was dead.

[ThomC]

Commissioner Sparks really shot down the dept's fair chase argument. So, Davis saw that he would be the bad guy if it passed and quickly backed pedaled. Probably Davis has a bigger fight in mind ie. tags for sale. Davis wants to be your friend for now.