Elk Reaper Report post Posted January 20, 2017 Just curious if any one has had the opportunity to compare them to some big names in the optics industry. How did they fare? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
creed_az_88 Report post Posted January 20, 2017 I looked through some sigs and I was impressed. Wasn't comparing them to anything side by side though. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hatchet Jack Report post Posted January 20, 2017 I spent a good half hour looking through the Maven 15x56 at their headquarters in Lander. The glass seems pretty good but the eye pieces suck so bad that I did not enjoy looking through them. They are bulky and did not fit my face at all, which doesn't really sound like a big deal but they were just weird to me and hard to get settled into like you do with a high end binocular. The 45mm series is built differently and I liked those, though I didn't have anything to do a side by side comparison. I think their bread and butter will be appealing to those guys who like the customization aspect of their product. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rageinthesage Report post Posted January 21, 2017 I spent a good half hour looking through the Maven 15x56 at their headquarters in Lander. The glass seems pretty good but the eye pieces suck so bad that I did not enjoy looking through them. They are bulky and did not fit my face at all, which doesn't really sound like a big deal but they were just weird to me and hard to get settled into like you do with a high end binocular. The 45mm series is built differently and I liked those, though I didn't have anything to do a side by side comparison. I think their bread and butter will be appealing to those guys who like the customization aspect of their product. Yup eye cups are really bulky on the 56's. They are not comparable to Swarovski. Swaro is king. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
firstcoueswas80 Report post Posted January 21, 2017 I spent a good half hour looking through the Maven 15x56 at their headquarters in Lander. The glass seems pretty good but the eye pieces suck so bad that I did not enjoy looking through them. They are bulky and did not fit my face at all, which doesn't really sound like a big deal but they were just weird to me and hard to get settled into like you do with a high end binocular. The 45mm series is built differently and I liked those, though I didn't have anything to do a side by side comparison. I think their bread and butter will be appealing to those guys who like the customization aspect of their product.Yup eye cups are really bulky on the 56's. They are not comparable to Swarovski. Swaro is king. If you did it over , would you spend the $1500on them again, or get Swaros? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Elk Reaper Report post Posted January 22, 2017 I am impressed with the Sig range finders and figured their binoculars would probably be very similar in quality and that means they are great! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites