Chris Report post Posted April 9, 2016 I watched a little of it. Sad to see that a little begging can get your sentence reduced. Kudos to the one commissioner that voted not to reduce the penalty for that old guy. Unfortunately he was out-voted 3 to 1. I'm not sure where the 5th commissioner was. I wish they'd get tougher and have much higher penalties. Enough already with being soft. Penalties are supposed to be a deterrent. Well it's not yet! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
bonecollector777 Report post Posted April 9, 2016 I watched a little of it. Sad to see that a little begging can get your sentence reduced. Kudos to the one commissioner that voted not to reduce the penalty for that old guy. Unfortunately he was out-voted 3 to 1. I'm not sure where the 5th commissioner was. I wish they'd get tougher and have much higher penalties. Enough already with being soft. Penalties are supposed to be a deterrent. Well it's not yet! What was the case? What did they end up sentencing him to? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Chris Report post Posted April 9, 2016 His original sentence was 5 years of no hunting or fishing. I didn't hear the original case, as it was at previous sentencing, but he was applying as resident in two states. They gave him back the fishing. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
