elkaholic Report post Posted December 21, 2015 home : latest news : local Share December 21, 2015 12/19/2015 6:02:00 AMHarassing wildlife: Antelope-herding case ends with deferred sentences Chad Smith The Daily CourierPRESCOTT - A local hunting guide, charged with two counts of knowingly using an aircraft to harass antelope in August 2014, has lost his hunting and guide licenses but was given a deferred sentence, according to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.Chad Smith, owner of Vaquero Outfitters, based in Prescott, and manager of the ORO Ranch about 45 miles northwest of Prescott, was charged in the case, along with helicopter pilot Christopher Atkinson of Texas.Smith will have to divest himself of ownership or financial interest in the outfitting company.Harassing wildlife with a helicopter is a federal offense - a misdemeanor - punishable with a maximum fine of $100,000 and up to six months in prison.Smith and Atkinson were each given a deferred sentence Monday, Dec. 14, in federal court, and will face no prison time or fine if they remain violation-free for four years.They're not allowed to seek or obtain hunting permits or engage in hunting at all, and may not operate a helicopter in Arizona."Every antelope in sight freaked out and started running," one young hunter told investigators, according to the 36-page complaint written by Fish and Wildlife investigator Preston Fant and filed in March 2015."We could see (the helicopter) pushing the antelope towards the ORO Ranch and flying very slowly as to stay right behind them," another hunter wrote about the dozen pronghorn.It's illegal in Arizona for people outside state or federal agencies to capture wildlife, Arizona Game and Fish Wildlife Manager Scott Poppenberger told the Courier in March.The defendants, according to the filing, denied chasing or herding antelope in northern Yavapai County. Smith had told investigators they were herding only cattle.Smith also denied having any hunting clients on the property, and said he never guided Atkinson until a wildlife officer showed him a photo of Atkinson with a trophy mule deer buck on Smith's Facebook page, the Courier previously reported.Atkinson said he hunted on the ORO in 2012 and 2013, he had a mule deer tag for 2014, and he paid Smith $12,500 to hunt the ORO in 2014.In 2003, Smith lost his guide license and hunting privileges for five years and was fined $2,450 by the Arizona Game and Fish Commission for using a vehicle for his client to prevent a trophy buck antelope from running onto a neighboring ranch, according to online commission minutes.He was convicted in Prescott Justice Court of taking wildlife from a vehicle and possessing unlawfully taken wildlife, according to the commission minutes. The hunter also was found guilty of shooting from a roadway.oon an added note - us wildlife services will have a listing of this case -- can not hunt or fish for 4 yrs was also included - I believe for both smith and pilot here agin fining these violators is the only real thing they understand -- hitting them where it counts - basically this isnt going to prevent anything 4 yrs -slap on wrist -- it should have been permanent revoked guiding/hunting period - already had it removed once ! learned nothing then this was a plea agreement - shoulda went to court!!! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lancetkenyon Report post Posted December 21, 2015 Bull crap sentence. 3 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Millhouse Report post Posted December 21, 2015 That sentence stinks for a repeat offender. They should have handed out a heavy financial fine imho. 3 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
willhunt4coues Report post Posted December 21, 2015 If he had been busted before they should be permanently suspended from hunting. At this rate they will continue to do this until it does get permanently suspended. 3 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
yotebuster Report post Posted December 21, 2015 If I read it right he doesn't lose any rights unless he breaks the law in the next 4 years. I believe that's what a 4 yr suspended sentnece means. So essentially nothing happened? Am I reading that right? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
AZkiller Report post Posted December 21, 2015 It says no prison time if clean for 4 years. Does not say they can hunt in 4 years. Im sure they are banned for life. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
willhunt4coues Report post Posted December 21, 2015 It says no prison time if clean for 4 years. Does not say they can hunt in 4 years. Im sure they are banned for life. us wildlife services will have a listing of this case -- can not hunt or fish for 4 yrs was also included - I believe for both smith and pilot Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DesertBull Report post Posted December 21, 2015 This was the federal portion of the case. Sounds like part of the plea deal was that he would not apply or take part in any hunts for 4 years. The FEDS don't administer hunting/guiding licenses in AZ, so it is doubtful that they had any choice in the matter. That would be up to the State and the AZGFD Now that he has been punished by the FEDS, Maybe the AZGFD will suspend/revoke his hunting/guiding license? 3 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
bonecollector Report post Posted December 21, 2015 I believe there is also a State hearing. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
208muley Report post Posted December 21, 2015 Can't hunt, guide in az for 4 years?????? Big deal, he has had that before and it didn't seem to stop him from doing his thing. Taking away his license means nothing! Poachers and law breakers don't need a license! Duh. Fine them and jail them then maybe people will think twice. Pathetic sentence ........ 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
STOMP442 Report post Posted December 21, 2015 Second offense should send them straight to federal pound them in the a$$ prison. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
.270 Report post Posted December 21, 2015 but his clients are rich. Laws don't count when you're rich. Or so it seems. I don't see a clients name listed or any fines for him. At least they exposed a non hunter mascarading as one. Lark Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DesertBull Report post Posted December 21, 2015 The hunter was not in the helicopter. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
.270 Report post Posted December 21, 2015 He was paying them. Who was the client? Anyone ever hear who it was? Musta been a tidy sum to keep that quiet. Be nice to know how many "conservation" clubs he belongs to. Lark 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Explorer Report post Posted December 21, 2015 I wonder if this will effect his employment at the ORO. Interesting that they waited till after a full hunting year to sentence him. Why didnt they confiscate ALL of his gear... 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites