elkaholic Report post Posted November 27, 2015 Here's your chance to get involved and tell them how you really feel about the roads they closed. if you have problems reading - just click on image to enlarge this was just mailed out this week! 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
More D Report post Posted November 27, 2015 They want justification for all the money spent to be able to pat themselves on the back. All of there new regulations only affect those of us who actually follow the rules. They essentially made it harder for me and my family to camp all the while doing nothing to enforce the ones who do not follow the rules. Not money well spent in my opinion. 4 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
hoghntr Report post Posted November 27, 2015 Sucks. Sincerely, Hoghntr Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
4Falls Report post Posted November 27, 2015 I promise they don't want my opinion. Mine would just end up in the circular file. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
elkaholic Report post Posted November 27, 2015 at the very least - list a couple of your favorite roads that were closed - ask for reasoning and request that they be reopened . here's a chance to at least voice an option to some of the closures. why open a thru road only 3/4 of the way and/or close a small portion on the same road - doesn't make much sense - I asked why To close a good road and reroute the travel across an almost impassable / dangerous route - makes no sense I'm sure every one here has good roads that were closed - at least ask why If you don't want more closed later - then at least say something now Hey we had little or no imput earlier 5 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
swwildlife Report post Posted November 30, 2015 They don't want your opinion, they will just use the opinions that match their agenda, the rest they will throw away. its all about closure and keeping everyone out of the forest. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MattMan Report post Posted November 30, 2015 The NEPA process requires that they adequately address all comments, whether they fit an agenda or not. It's a well defined and structured process. If there are logical reasons why a route or an area should be left open, state them. They may respond with logical reasons it needs to be closed to protect a unique resource. They are also faced with balancing the desires of many different users. Someone camping in a tent may not want to have a six trailer party camp with all night generators be able to pull up and camp next to them. "I want to drive my SxS cross country and love to road hunt, even if I'm not on roads" and "You're messing up my ability to drive willynilly across the forest to look for sheds" are not logical reasons. If everyone throws their hands up and says they won't listen anyway, you're right. They'll do what they want. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
swwildlife Report post Posted November 30, 2015 Sounds like you work for the forest service. or at least fell for their BS. yes by law they have to ask for input but by no means do they have to listen. do you remember when the game and fish had all the public hearings on the direction of hunting in AZ. ie; how we wanted them to manage our wildlife and the draw process. they worded the questions that were asked to fit their agenda. more opportunity means more tags to them and more money. hence we have a fall javelina and a real late archery elk season. and most of the hunts run thru the full moon. I was at most of those meetings around the state and what I heard at those meetings was not even close to what was implemented. there is thousands of acres that are not accessible by vehicle of any type, let the back packers and hikers go there. leave the roads open for those that want that type of experience. as for people making new roads, I say forest service get off your butt and patrol the forest. then prosecute the offenders. 4 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
hoghntr Report post Posted November 30, 2015 Sounds like you work for the forest service. or at least fell for their BS. yes by law they have to ask for input but by no means do they have to listen. do you remember when the game and fish had all the public hearings on the direction of hunting in AZ. ie; how we wanted them to manage our wildlife and the draw process. they worded the questions that were asked to fit their agenda. more opportunity means more tags to them and more money. hence we have a fall javelina and a real late archery elk season. and most of the hunts run thru the full moon. I was at most of those meetings around the state and what I heard at those meetings was not even close to what was implemented. there is thousands of acres that are not accessible by vehicle of any type, let the back packers and hikers go there. leave the roads open for those that want that type of experience. as for people making new roads, I say forest service get off your butt and patrol the forest. then prosecute the offenders. Besides fantastic taxidermy work i knew i liked you for at least 1 other reason. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MattMan Report post Posted December 1, 2015 Sounds like you work for the forest service. or at least fell for their BS. yes by law they have to ask for input but by no means do they have to listen. do you remember when the game and fish had all the public hearings on the direction of hunting in AZ. ie; how we wanted them to manage our wildlife and the draw process. they worded the questions that were asked to fit their agenda. more opportunity means more tags to them and more money. hence we have a fall javelina and a real late archery elk season. and most of the hunts run thru the full moon. I was at most of those meetings around the state and what I heard at those meetings was not even close to what was implemented. there is thousands of acres that are not accessible by vehicle of any type, let the back packers and hikers go there. leave the roads open for those that want that type of experience. as for people making new roads, I say forest service get off your butt and patrol the forest. then prosecute the offenders. No, actually, I don't work for the Forest Service. But I understand the NEPA process, and I've used the process successfully, since I actually made the effort to learn it. A VERY large portion of the anti hunters understand it too, and use it frequently to further their agendas... and they don't sit back and whine. They make comments that have to be addressed, and they make a lot of them. The surveys G&F did for the hunt restructuring had nothing to do with NEPA, hence the reason they didn't have to listen, address comments, respond to comments, etc. That was a survey. The surveys that were turned in overwhelmingly supported "Increased Opportunity". Trick question? Probably. Your confusion between the two indicates that you don't have a clue what the NEPA process is. Do you even know what the acronym stands for? Get involved, make comments through the proper channels that have to be addressed or responded to. Or sit back and whine, watch it happen, and eat what's tossed on your plate. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
swwildlife Report post Posted December 1, 2015 National Environmental Policy Act, classic example of the bureaucratic monster we call our government. now due to the act expensive environmental impact statements must be done and paid for before anything can change in the forest, including updating signage and other things that could be done at the local level. It still doesn't change the fact that when the eco forest service wants to close the roads so less people have access, they ask for comment, do an environmental study, get the studies needed to validity their proposed change and the people be damned. All the power to you and i applaud your desire to make a change. but I have wasted countless hours fighting bureaucrats to no avail. I will be the first to pat you on the back, thank you for your work if you can get them to acknowledge the hunter is a main user of the forest and their needs should be considered. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
azslim Report post Posted December 1, 2015 G&F was a major force behind closing all the roads on NF's until they found out THEY wouldn't be receiving money for enforcement, then they backed away and pretended they have no dog in the fight. This is a law that was enacted by Clinton and nothing was done until Obama. My friends that work for the FS hate it as much as anyone but can't do anything but sit back and watch it get shoved down our throats. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MT_Sourdough Report post Posted December 2, 2015 I do not know that area, but I support road closures. I would love to see atvs parked at gates and trailheads. I agree, though, that the Fish and Game spends more money and energy on self promotion then they do on enforcing the laws. Make the fines for non-compliance high enough and they will redirect their attention to start collecting those fines. It sucks to turn our woods into a police state on the other hand. 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
tjhunt2 Report post Posted December 2, 2015 Thanks Gary, aka elkaholic, for letting us know about this. I don't spend a lot of time in Coconino but I will send them a few of my thoughts. swwildlife.......and there is a problem with a late archery elk hunt and the full moon? TJ Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wildwoody Report post Posted December 2, 2015 Blah, blah, blah. Close my woods, no one should have rights but me. Blah, blah Share this post Link to post Share on other sites