Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Sad to see the distortion on the photo like that. Its already an impressive animal and this editing gimmick only takes away from the trophy IMHO :unsure:

Say what now? Why do you think that?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe its just me, but dont see 253. Popeyes sheds at his best are around 250.

post-10954-0-82253400-1440432756.jpg

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Sad to see the distortion on the photo like that. Its already an impressive animal and this editing gimmick only takes away from the trophy IMHO :unsure:

Say what now? Why do you think that?

 

I'm all about posing the animal in favorable lighting, and with a nice scenic backdrop for the trophy shot.

 

However, using an ultra wide camera lens to distort the relative size of the antlers and/or "long arming" the trophy shot looks so far unnatural looks tacky. Going extreme like this tends to take away from the glory of the animal rather than add to it. It draws attention to the tackiness of the photographer or whoever set the shot up and makes it more about them than hunting and conservation.

 

Sorry to derail a discussion but its my belief that if certain behavior isn't called out that you'll get more of it and it gets legitimized over time. And that's "Just my opinion."

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

Sad to see the distortion on the photo like that. Its already an impressive animal and this editing gimmick only takes away from the trophy IMHO :unsure:

Say what now? Why do you think that?

 

I'm all about posing the animal in favorable lighting, and with a nice scenic backdrop for the trophy shot.

 

However, using an ultra wide camera lens to distort the relative size of the antlers and/or "long arming" the trophy shot looks so far unnatural looks tacky. Going extreme like this tends to take away from the glory of the animal rather than add to it. It draws attention to the tackiness of the photographer or whoever set the shot up and makes it more about them than hunting and conservation.

 

Sorry to derail a discussion but its my belief that if certain behavior isn't called out that you'll get more of it and it gets legitimized over time. And that's "Just my opinion."

 

Ok cool. I misunderstood your original post. When you mentioned editing I thought you were referring that the photo had been photoshopped to make it look bigger. Heck of a buck even if the pic is a bit deceiving.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm in agreement XNT!!! It's a giant, why are we trying to make it something it is not.

 

Couple sponsors on this site do the same thing, tilt the head so far forward a 140 class buck looks big.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm in agreement XNT!!! It's a giant, why are we trying to make it something it is not.

 

Couple sponsors on this site do the same thing, tilt the head so far forward a 140 class buck looks big.

I agree. Got a brochure from an outfitter since I drew a late Kaibab tag. All the pics are taken tilted way out in front of the hunter like this one. Some of the bucks are probably in the 160 range. Eastmans Journal years ago had an article on proper photo taking. It taught me alot.

post-10954-0-06674300-1440455063_thumb.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×