Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
coues32

Ideas on conserving our game.

Recommended Posts

Would you please send me a pm on good ideas that need to be addressed, to return our numbers where they used to be.

 

Please no pissing matches here!

 

 

Lower tags

 

Better bonus point system.

 

Harvest report mandatory.

 

Antler Point restrictions on bulls and bucks.

 

Thanks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Cant send p/m's from my phone but i'll try and answer your questions.... As far as tag numbers .....This is the single biggest issue the azgfd wrestles with ( along with every other G&F dept in the western states )....There are over 300.00 applicant's in this state and they ALL want to hunt every yr. We lose tens of thousands of acres to development every yr. On average we receive far less rain then we did many yr's ago. Harvest of predator's is less then half of what it once was. This could go on for several page's.....Then you factor in that the Dept gets the majority of it's revenue from tag sale's and you have a recipe for disaster. They Dept is in a no win situation..., The overwhelming majority of hunter's don't know that this site or any like it exist. They give little to nothing back to the land or it's inhabitants. They could care less if they see a good buck, bull, goat, Ect....All they want is a tag every time they apply, So the dept in an effort to keep the overwhelming majority of hunters happy and bring in the revenue needed to sustain the dept sets tag numbers extremely high. Now the 10% of hunters that would rather wait several yrs between tags in an effort to have a opportunity at a trophy class animal and see a larger number of game animals could not disagree more with this mind set. But if they reduce tag numbers they need to increase tags prices, If you go back and read any one of the hundreds of post on this site and all the other hunting sites when we last had a increase in prices you will find that most people on this site where going to have to live in a cardboard box down in the river bottom because of a small increase in tag cost, Imagine for a moment what the outcry would be if the dept raised tags prices to the level needed to do what the 10% of hunters want them to do. Now if you take the emotion out of it and really look at the numbers from the past 20 yrs the buck / doe , bull / cow ratio's are no better or worse then they were then, Yes some yrs are better then others and some units are far worse then they were but there are just as many units were the numbers are far better then the were.

 

Bonus points....As someone who hunts all the western states I can say without any doubt we have the best system going. There has been talks for yrs to revise the system as to date no one has come up with anything better then what is already in place ....Maybe a conservation point to help get more people involved in conservation projects.

 

I have tried for over 10 yrs to get the Dept to have mandatory reporting and I have been told over and over that studies have shown it will reduce hunter retention significantly.. I have asked why and have never been given a reason

 

Overall I think there is room for improvement in many areas, But it will cost MONEY and take time, We as hunters are just as much to blame for this situation as the dept...We scream for more opportunity, We bitch when prices go up, We sit on are butt when manpower is needed on projects, We support the dept when and if it benefits the individual.....

 

If you put point restrictions in place all you end up with is a bunch of bucks and bulls shot and not tagged because we hunters cant hold off long enough to make sure it's legal...Colorado has a Huge issue with this very thing...

Edited by azelkhunter2
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

All of the above sounds good. Add increasing the cost of tags to the mix to make up for the revenue loss to G&F. Double the cost of tags and reduce tags by 50%. This, coming from a guy who has 15 bonus points for elk, and 23 for antelope.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This board would explode with increasing tags by 2x. Just go back and look at the threads regarding t he most recent price changes.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Tags are low compared to what they used to be. Need to conserve prime habitat in order to grow more deer.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This board would explode with increasing tags by 2x. Just go back and look at the threads regarding t he most recent price changes.

And I would lead explosion.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I will lead the charge in helping DB explode........... :blink:

 

Increase deer tag price to $100

Decrease tags by at least 35%, more in select units.

Poison coyotes

Poison Wolves

Harvest more Lions

Pray for lots of winter/spring rain

 

See how easy it could be without Bureaucrats involved

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I will lead the charge in helping DB explode........... :blink:

 

Increase deer tag price to $100

Decrease tags by at least 35%, more in select units.

Poison coyotes

Poison Wolves

Harvest more Lions

Pray for lots of winter/spring rain

 

See how easy it could be without Bureaucrats involved

 

 

Then watch how long it takes the libs to defeat us at the ballot box because 50% of the hunters lost interest and took up photography or mountain biking.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree coyotes are big problem and the big decrease in the number in deer since trapping was outlawed.

 

Anyone know why you can only hunt coyotes at night in certain units? Only thing I can come up with up is the wolf deal.

 

Maybe we can start a bounty on dogs until someone can figure out how to make a coyote trap that will work.

 

 

If we cant keep the use of hounds for lion hunting legal in the state we're gonna be in big trouble!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would say as opposed to increasing the bag limit on javelina put it at one, keep it at one, and allow unsuccessful hunter to apply for those leftover tags -- let the scrubs go after them pigs over and and over and over -- like me.

 

Also mandatory harvest reporting would go a long way to managing game appropriately.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Get rid of the wolves

Lion tag included with all big game tags

Conservation point available each year for working a project or turning in 20 coyote tails

Square the bonus points

Place a departmental priority on habitat projects and land access rather than wolf and bighorn reintroductions

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

close some FR permanently.

Go to preference points instead of bonus

Clear cut sections of forest

Controlled burns

Dig more water retention catchments Like unit 8

Improve trail systems add TH at old FR that was closed

Mandatory reporting across the board

supplement predator hunting in some way

Transplant Animals from out of state to diversify gene pool

1 year off after Bull or Deer tag, more for premium hunts like 2 or 3 years

More shooting facilities with outdoor classes and avtivities for retention

Biologist assistant programs for youth (assist biologist in the field on game surveys habitat surveys etc)

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×