Jump to content
ctracingraptor

26 Nosler

Recommended Posts

Wow, that 6.5-06 is flat out impressive.

Yes it is.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Jeff,

 

Gunwerks uses h1000, buddy of mine who has a similar wildcat used US 869 & RL 33 with success. I loaded some US 869, and it showed potential, but used about 10 more grains of powder for about the same speed (+/- about 50fps) and a noticeable amount more recoil. Plus, its not a temperature insensitive powder like Retumbo and H1000.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Lance,

 

Please run the numbers again. The energy values are way off...Referring to post 29

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As far as the 26 nosler, my opinion is simple. It would have been a decent option before the era of affordable laser range finders. It's only real quality is a ultra flat trajectory, which is of much less importance today than it was 25 years ago. Now with reliable rangefinding, it's better to have better throat/bore stability/consistency for more quality trigger time and less load adjustment and time waiting on new barrels. Sure with heavier than 130 grain pills windage can be improved but a few less inches at a grand doesn't take the place of quality, consistent trigger time. I'm sure it's life is shorter than many think. My guess would be that you would develop a load and enjoy it for a couple hundred rounds at best before you noticed pressures going up due to a very heat checked and eroded throat. Time to set back and make load adjustments. Enjoy for another 100-200 rounds at best. Repeat. Then it'll start happening every 50 rounds...sure we can milk it for 1000+ rounds but not without additional headaches, expenses and down time. For a 26 cal, run with a 6.5x47L up to 6.5-06 and be happy, the 26 nosler will make you miserable if you're serious about shooting and practicing. For the guy going to buy 4 boxes of ammo, sight in, check the zero once a year and hunt a few times a year, it could be an ok choice. That said, this is a long range section and that kind of trigger time and long range shooting don't go hand in hand.

 

Just my opinion,

 

M

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Lance,

Please run the numbers again. The energy values are way off...Referring to post 29

Lance,

Please run the numbers again. The energy values are way off...Referring to post 29

I bet you are correct. I am away from my computer for the day though. I will revisit this tomorrow. Thanks, my Strelok Pro seems to be off compared to Shooter, which I trust.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here are the updated stats: The 6.5 does give up energy to the 7LRM.

7LRM running 180 Berger Hybrids at .674 G1 BC & 2950fps VS. 6.5-06AI running 140 Berger VLD @ .612 G1 BC & 3180fps VS. 26 Nosler running 160 Matrix VLD @ .685 G1 BC & 3100.

 

 

 

@ muzzle:

26 Nosler: 0, 0, 3100fps, 3414ft/lbs

6.5-.06: 0, 0, 3180fps, 3143ft/lbs

7RLM: 0, 0, 2950fps, 3478ft/lbs

 

@ 500:

26 Nosler: -31.0", -1.7mil, 2451fps, 2135ft/lbs

6.5-06: -30.20", -1.7mil, 2446fps, 1860ft/lbs

7LRM: -34.94", -1.9mil, 2311fps, 2136ft/lbs

 

@ 1000:

26 Nosler: -208.3", -5.8mil, 1892fps, 1272ft/lbs

6.5-06: -208.2", -5.8mil, 1825fps, 1036ft/lbs

7LRM: -234.9", -6.5mil, 1763fps, 1243ft/lbs

 

@ 1500:

26 Nosler: -635.3", -11.8mil, 1428fps, 724ft/lbs

6.5-06: -656.5", -12.2mil, 1331fps, 551ft/lbs

7LRM: -722", -13.4mil, 1324fps, 700ft/lbs

 

@ 2000:

26 Nosler: -1497.6", -20.8mil, 1111fps, 438.7ft/lbs

6.5-06: -1603.7", -22.3mil, 1038fps, 335ft/lbs

7LRM: -1713.4", -23.8mil, 1053fps, 443ft/lbs

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×