shortpants Report post Posted April 9, 2007 For him that would be $23,000 + the fines he had to pay. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DesertBull Report post Posted April 9, 2007 For him that would be $23,000 + the fines he had to pay. Still $100K cheaper than the auction tag. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
azcouesandelk Report post Posted April 9, 2007 What I have heard on the rack now is that the poacher was on the phone with someone at the show and was bidding that way. A very wealthy man had heard this and refused to let that happen so he kept bidding to make sure that the poacher would not get the rack back. I think that we owe this gentleman some respect from keeping the rack out of a poachers hands!!! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GameHauler Report post Posted April 9, 2007 If that is true that man really deserves a thank you from everyone. That is putting your money to a good cause Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
KGAINES Report post Posted April 9, 2007 I had a great time at the banquet as well, met a few people from the site as well. "What I have heard on the rack now is that the poacher was on the phone with someone at the show and was bidding that way. A very wealthy man had heard this and refused to let that happen so he kept bidding to make sure that the poacher would not get the rack back. I think that we owe this gentleman some respect from keeping the rack out of a poachers hands!!!" If that is true then there should be a way that it is against the law for that person to ever possess it again, no matter how they aquire it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites