Non-Typical Solutions Report post Posted July 26, 2014 Any feelings out there about Big Lake road getting paved from the Alpine side? I am curious as to the why and who makes those kind of decisions. One of my favorite roads to drive and see game. I have mixed feelings about the "improvement" civilized left and we civilized right. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Pine Donkey Report post Posted July 26, 2014 Makes me sad. I love the Alpine/Nutrioso area and spend a lot of time there. During the summer it seems that Phoenix heads to the mountains. Payson, Showlow, and Pinetop along with space and dirt roads work like a filter that keeps Phoenix to the a West of Alpine. Paving this road, after paving it from Sunrise to Big Lake, just weaken that filter. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Coach Report post Posted July 26, 2014 Yeah, I agree with you guys. IMO it's not necessary. The access up there is great, but I preferred the dirt road feel. I live here in Lakeside and spend a lot of time up around Big Lake and all of Unit 1. The good news is, they'll never pave it all (I hope) and there are still lots and lots of great roads to go explore. It doesn't really surprise me that they want to continue the pavement all the way through 3 forks to Alpine, but that is such a great road already, I don't understand the need. There are a lot of cool campgrounds off that road, that will lose appeal if it's paved. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
muledeerarea33? Report post Posted July 26, 2014 Around 5 or so years ago we went to alpine to fish and hang out the last weekend of May. It ended up snowing almost 3 feet!!!! We drove the girlfriends (now my wife) Toyota corolla all the way to big lake without any snow plows in front of us, dirt the whole way there! Great fishing too!! Point is.... A corolla in 3 foot of snow made it with a dirt road, why waste money for asphalt??? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Kaffer62 Report post Posted July 26, 2014 I don't think this project is needed. It's a waste of money and a shame 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
trphyhntr Report post Posted July 26, 2014 was talking about this with my old man the other day. i hate it, although those pot holes coming in from the rez side sucked. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MULEPACKHUNTER Report post Posted July 26, 2014 Beginning of the end,remember Bartlet lake? It is wrecked now but used to be a great get away before they paved it. Nuff said 3 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Coues79 Report post Posted July 26, 2014 Yeah, I agree with you guys. IMO it's not necessary. The access up there is great, but I preferred the dirt road feel. I live here in Lakeside and spend a lot of time up around Big Lake and all of Unit 1. The good news is, they'll never pave it all (I hope) and there are still lots and lots of great roads to go explore. It doesn't really surprise me that they want to continue the pavement all the way through 3 forks to Alpine, but that is such a great road already, I don't understand the need. There are a lot of cool campgrounds off that road, that will lose appeal if it's paved. I have heard that the plan does call for paving it all the way to big lake.... I sure hope you're right about it not going all the way. I don't like seeing it go in period. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
hntnIwlgo Report post Posted July 26, 2014 Was there last weekend and the flag man told us the road will be paved all the way to Big Lake. I, like others who have posted here, would prefer the old washboard road. We have seen so much wildlife on this road. I wonder just how fast people are going to drive this road once it is paved. Drivers' speed once paved will be problematic. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest 300ultramag. Report post Posted July 26, 2014 What a joke.......One word why? 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest 300ultramag. Report post Posted July 26, 2014 why don't they connect greer too while there at it? dumbasses Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Coach Report post Posted July 26, 2014 why don't they connect greer too while there at it? dumbasses My guess is, that's next. They have a whole different perspective than we do. They want to modernize, while we want to preserve. It's "progress" in action, and it's here to stay, unfortunately. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Non-Typical Solutions Report post Posted July 26, 2014 Back in the 70's right there at 3 forks we called that slippery hill. We would leave Alpine right after work to get the last hours of fishing at Big Lake. We would walk the railroad bed on the back side where now there is a boat ramp. Days long gone. Slippery hill will never be the same. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mc68 Report post Posted July 26, 2014 I just hate seeing it be paved. It has become so commercial now and doesn't seem to be getting any better. Miss the days of going up there and not having a new city being built every weekend(the Big lake campgrounds). Guess my idea of camping and enjoying the outdoors is different than others. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
huntjunkie Report post Posted July 26, 2014 I don't think this project is needed. It's a waste of money and a shame +1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites