Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
desertmafia21

Mt Lemmon fire?

Recommended Posts

Quite possibly the Oak fire which they have neen monitoring and not attempting to put out. Monitoring involves an assigned crew keeping tabs on the fire to insure no structures are threatened.

 

Here's a link to this fire

http://inciweb.nwcg.gov/incident/3901/#

 

All Arizona fires

http://inciweb.nwcg.gov/state/3/#

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep, its the Oak Fire in.near the Galliuros. I'm good friends with the FS biologist and she's been sending good updates. No structures are threatened at this time and the FS is allowing it to burn for resource benefit. From all of the reports I've seen, its a good cleansing burn that should result in some good deer hunting after the rains hit that area! And if any critical habitat (from an ESA standpoint) is in the path of the fire, the FS can easily let the fire burn through it and help improve it. Presence of CH is not a reason to stop a fire's progression. I've worked many fires in CH and I've worked with NPS, FS, and BLM on fires burning in critical habitat. Really no big deal.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep, its the Oak Fire in.near the Galliuros. I'm good friends with the FS biologist and she's been sending good updates. No structures are threatened at this time and the FS is allowing it to burn for resource benefit. From all of the reports I've seen, its a good cleansing burn that should result in some good deer hunting after the rains hit that area! And if any critical habitat (from an ESA standpoint) is in the path of the fire, the FS can easily let the fire burn through it and help improve it. Presence of CH is not a reason to stop a fire's progression. I've worked many fires in CH and I've worked with NPS, FS, and BLM on fires burning in critical habitat. Really no big deal.

 

Thanks for continuing to keep everyone honest on the use of the term "critical habitat." :-)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Yep, its the Oak Fire in.near the Galliuros. I'm good friends with the FS biologist and she's been sending good updates. No structures are threatened at this time and the FS is allowing it to burn for resource benefit. From all of the reports I've seen, its a good cleansing burn that should result in some good deer hunting after the rains hit that area! And if any critical habitat (from an ESA standpoint) is in the path of the fire, the FS can easily let the fire burn through it and help improve it. Presence of CH is not a reason to stop a fire's progression. I've worked many fires in CH and I've worked with NPS, FS, and BLM on fires burning in critical habitat. Really no big deal.

 

Thanks for continuing to keep everyone honest on the use of the term "critical habitat." :-)

 

 

My pleasure. Its great being able to talk to you guys about it all. This is nothing compared to the congressional inquires I've had to deal with because a politician somewhere created a major stink...all because he/she didn't know what they were talking about (imagine that)!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Quite possibly the Oak fire which they have neen monitoring and not attempting to put out. Monitoring involves an assigned crew keeping tabs on the fire to insure no structures are threatened.

 

Here's a link to this fire

http://inciweb.nwcg.gov/incident/3901/#

 

All Arizona fires

http://inciweb.nwcg.gov/state/3/#

Noted CH removed

 

I'm not a politician!!

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×