couesmagnet Report post Posted June 14, 2014 That's one ugly deer. I'd shoot him just to get him out of the gene pool. I'd rather have a clean 200 incher than that buck. Nothing wrong with some experimentation just keep it behind the fence. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Antmo23 Report post Posted June 14, 2014 That's one ugly deer. I'd shoot him just to get him out of the gene pool. I'd rather have a clean 200 incher than that buck. Nothing wrong with some experimentation just keep it behind the fence. That's one ugly deer. I'd shoot him just to get him out of the gene pool. I'd rather have a clean 200 incher than that buck. Nothing wrong with some experimentation just keep it behind the fence. AND outta the record books. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CaptainObvious Report post Posted June 14, 2014 That's one ugly deer. I'd shoot him just to get him out of the gene pool. I'd rather have a clean 200 incher than that buck. Nothing wrong with some experimentation just keep it behind the fence. That's one ugly deer. I'd shoot him just to get him out of the gene pool. I'd rather have a clean 200 incher than that buck. Nothing wrong with some experimentation just keep it behind the fence.AND outta the record books. The record books are what made this kinda stuff happen...just sayin Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mattys281 Report post Posted June 14, 2014 That's one ugly deer. I'd shoot him just to get him out of the gene pool. I'd rather have a clean 200 incher than that buck. Nothing wrong with some experimentation just keep it behind the fence. That's one ugly deer. I'd shoot him just to get him out of the gene pool. I'd rather have a clean 200 incher than that buck. Nothing wrong with some experimentation just keep it behind the fence. AND outta the record books. Record books are all about who spend the most money anyway, so what's the problem here? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
