roninflag Report post Posted May 9, 2014 we had a Lot of mule deer in the 60's and 70's. no wolves then,. I think the fawns would have a better chance if there were no cattle which would allow the grass to grow Up to give the fawns mover cover. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Chef Report post Posted May 9, 2014 Chef I like the pic of the loaded ammo. what cal/load . pretty. Thanks Ron! 140 grain Accubonds & 140 grain VLD for a 270WSM. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
muleskinner Report post Posted May 10, 2014 So the morons in govt want more wolves...and roninflag wants to do away with the cattle! Wonder which idea makes more sense? 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Coach Report post Posted May 10, 2014 These aren't real wolves as much as feral dogs. I don't see them having a big impact when managed properly - by us. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
roninflag Report post Posted May 10, 2014 So the morons in govt want more wolves...and roninflag wants to do away with the cattle! Wonder which idea makes more sense? Mule- i am talking about Public Land. i just want every one to know we are subsidising the cattle business ( WHY?), which i do not agree with. Also, if we had above average rain (and) or remove the cattle the grass would grow up , more quail rabbits mice ect would be produced for the predators to choose from. 90% fawn survival inside the predator proof fence fence at 3 bar, 17 % outside . you need at least 35% just to stay even. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
