Snapshot Report post Posted March 27, 2014 A fire in the cockpit, or avionics panels would disrupt things in a hurry. Especially if they couldn't see what they were doing. I feel bad for the people on that plane. It would, really, really, suck, to be a passenger under those circumstances. The families now have to deal with the aftermath, and closure. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ctafoya Report post Posted March 28, 2014 If we were ment to fly we would have wings. I keep my butt on the ground. Too much out of your control up there. To many things can go wrong and you cant do anything about it when they do. 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
4Falls Report post Posted March 28, 2014 So a few days ago there was a satelite blip and some debris, they declared it conclusive evidence that the plane had gone down in the Indian ocean. Now they are looking at some different debris... in a different area.... how botched can this "investigation" get? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Coues79 Report post Posted March 28, 2014 Would cell phones not give off "pings" and give location while the aircraft had been in the air? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Snapshot Report post Posted March 28, 2014 I think unless the cell phone has GPS tracking turned on, you need three cell phone towers to triangulate the location of a cell phone, or with whatever technology they use. Could be they were outside of normal cell phone coverage range, and only satellite comm would work. I am just guessing. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
reganranch Report post Posted March 29, 2014 Cellphones don't work traveling 500+ MPH at 20K+ feet over an ocean. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
4Falls Report post Posted March 31, 2014 They still have no clue where this thing is. The debris they found is NOT the plane. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Snapshot Report post Posted March 31, 2014 Unless the whole plane sunk into the ocean, there should be a lot of debris that hasn't sunk,? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wildwoody Report post Posted March 31, 2014 just turned to cnn, will tese idiots ever quit speculating, they have nothing Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest wdenike Report post Posted March 31, 2014 CNN???????????????????? PEE YOU something smells!!!! :P 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Snapshot Report post Posted April 1, 2014 Flight 370 reality check: A Boeing 777 doesn't disappear unless governments want it to disappear Sunday, March 30, 2014by Mike Adams, the Health RangerEditor of NaturalNews.com (See all articles...)Tags: Flight 370, reality check, government involvement (NaturalNews) As the conventional news coverage of Flight 370 becomes increasingly delusional and detached from reality, for the sake of all those families and loved ones still suffering I thought it important to publish a reality check that can help bring the discussion back to some common sense.Let's cover five indisputable facts about governments, radar and aircraft:Fact #1) Every modern nation tracks air traffic with military radar systemsAll the key nations involved in Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 run military radar systems 24/7. This includes Malaysia and India, of course. These radar systems are operated for purposes of national defense, making sure each nation can identify aircraft entering its air space.If you don't believe that military-grade radar systems can track the altitude, direction and speed of a Boeing 777, then you don't believe in radar at all.Fact #2) Every modern nation runs civilian air traffic control "passive" radar systems that work even without aircraft transpondersBeyond the military radar, modern nations also run air traffic control radar systems which work in both "active" (transponder) modes and "passive" mode (requiring no transponder). Although civilian air traffic control systems are generally not as powerful or accurate as military systems, they are nonetheless fully capable of detecting and tracking a Boeing 777.In fact, as any air traffic controller will tell you, their radar systems are fully capable of tracking flocks of birds and other airborne objects which are far smaller than a Boeing 777.Fact #3) A Boeing 777 has a massive radar signatureUnless equipped with some sort of exotic technology we've never heard of -- like a radar "invisibility cloak" borrowed from the Klingons of Star Trek -- a Boeing 777 has a massive radar signature. The cylindrical fuselage, curved wings and surface controls (flaps, ailerons, rudder) all reflect radar waves with very high efficiency. A commercial Boeing aircraft is not a stealth bomber.The explanation that this Boeing 777 "vanished" from radar simply doesn't hold water. And if the explanation is that "the pilot flew the aircraft at very low elevation to evade radar," then it makes no sense that the pilot would carry out this complex evasion for 4-7 hours and then plunge the aircraft into the Indian Ocean.Furthermore, a suicidal pilot has no need to evade radar in the first place! If he wanted to crash the plane, he could have done it immediately after takeoff, or at any point during the first few minutes of flight. There is no need to evade radar if you wish to consciously crash the aircraft.Fact #4) Boeing 777 aircraft cannot survive a collision with the ocean and remain intactOne of the most ridiculous theories currently being floated around the mainstream media -- and written by journalists who apparently have no education in fundamental physics or flight mechanics -- is that Flight 370 "crashed" into the Indian Ocean and somehow magically remained fully intact!Although it's comforting to think that airplanes are made of incredibly strong steel that can withstand high-velocity impacts with bodies of water, the far more sobering truth is that aircraft are flimsy structures made primarily of aluminum. Aircraft are not rigid; they flex and bend, even during flight. If you've ever watched the wings during flight, you've no doubt noticed that they have a surprisingly wide range of movement, almost as if the wings are flapping. An aircraft fuselage moves, bends, expands and compresses due to changes in temperature, ambient pressure and structural stress.A large commercial aircraft that crashes into water simply cannot remain intact. While there are some miraculous water landings where skilled pilots were able to "land" aircraft on water thanks to near-stall speeds, flaps and amazing flying skills, a full-speed crash into water can never result in the aircraft remaining fully intact. The nose, wings, fuselage and tail would all be torn apart by impact with a body of water.Even many attempted "water landings" still result in huge structural failures of the aircraft, as seen in this photo of a relatively gentle water landing of a flight headed for Bali:An actual crash into water would produce a massive amount of debris, including seats, bodies and other debris easy to spot from satellite imagery or rescue searches.Fact #5) A vanishing of Flight 370 would have taken the cooperation of governmentsHere's the most astonishing fact of all: because of all the facts stated above, the vanishing of Flight 370 must have required intentional planning and action from at least one government (and possibly more). Somebody is covering up the truth of what happened to MH370, and it looks almost certain that the Malaysian government is part of this cover-up, as I previously reported.The mainstream media is extremely reluctant to ever report on any sort of government cover-up, preferring to pretend that governments are always transparent and honest with the people of the world. Although such an idea is utterly laughable, it remains the default position of the conventional media. That's why the media prefers to run with other theories such as "pilot suicide" or "flight accident," neither of which withstand scrutiny of the facts. (Case in point: If it crashed into the ocean, the black boxes would have been transmitting their location for weeks now, and they would be easy to find.)World governments routinely lie and deceive the public, of course. As a simple example of that, the U.S. government has now been exposed as spying on all the other governments of the world with an above-top-secret NSA spy program revealed by Edward Snowden. Before his revelations, anyone suggesting the government was "listening to your phone calls" was immediately called a crackpot by the clueless conventional media. Now, of course, we all have come to realize that the NSA really is recording all your phone calls, text messages, social media posts and financial transactions. This is no longer a secret. It's not a conspiracy theory. It's business as usual at the highest levels of government. And yes, it's wildly illegal, but it goes on nonetheless.That's why the idea that a government "couldn't possibly have lied about Flight 370" is preposterous. Of course a government could lie about Flight 370. It is far harder for any government to tell the truth than to lie, in fact. And the government of Malaysia no more adheres to truth and transparency than the U.S. government, the Russian government or even the government of China. All governments routinely lie to the public almost by default. To expect a government to tell you the truth about anything is to live in fantasy land.But if you are crazy enough to believe that governments never lie, then I'm happy to report to you that Obamacare now has 6 million enrollees who have all paid their insurance premiums, the national debt of the USA is rapidly shrinking by the hour, nobody in Washington D.C. ever abuses power, the gun-running conspiracy by California Democratic Senator Leland Yee never happened and your tax dollars are always put to a positive purpose for the betterment of society. Conclusion Flight 370 most likely did not crash; it was almost certainly taken over (possibly by remote control) and flown to a destination with all passengers alive and the aircraft in one piece.What happens from there is anyone's guess, but the most likely use of such a stolen aircraft is to turn it into a massive airborne weapons delivery system to be outfitted with biological, chemical or nuclear weapons. Believe me when I say this is the real scenario being discussed behind closed doors at the Pentagon. The "pilot suicide" explanation is merely the sucker's version of events for public consumption. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites