FECES FLOWS DOWN HILL

[Guest wdenike]

Written by Michael Hammond
Why Gun Owners Should Oppose 8 Million New Anti-gun Voters

The House Republican leadership will soon announce a set of "principles" for immigration reform. Supposedly, if these "principles" are not well-received, the House will shelve the issue for the remainder of the year.

To be blunt: The health of the Second Amendment relies on demolishing these "principles."

Immigration reform will add over 8,000,000 anti-gun voters to the voting rolls. There may be as many as 11.5 million persons illegally in the United States. And, a Pew poll from last year indicated that if illegal immigrants were given citizenship, they would vote for liberal, anti-gun candidates by an 8-to-1 margin.

This is exactly what happened to California -- which was once a Red State. Because of the Simpson-Mazzoli amnesty bill of 1986, the state lurched violently to the left and now can’t pass gun control restrictions fast enough.

If this were to happen at the national level, we would lose the ability to stop massive gun bans and gun registration schemes. And all of this occurs at a time when a Fox poll shows the American people oppose Obama’s immigration policies by a margin of 36% to 54%.

The first reality is this: If the House passes ANYTHING, the Senate will tack on its amnesty bill and send it to conference. And the national conversation will turn off of ObamaCare and onto immigration.

And guess what? Every gun-hating institution which moved heaven and earth to pass gun control will move heaven and earth to get the House to retreat -- if not to a "pathway to citizenship," to a "pathway to legalization."

They will have created the biggest and most motivated Obama-loving movement in the country -- devoted to electing anti-gun politicians and retaining Harry Reid's control of the Senate.

THE BAIT-N-Switch

What will Republicans get, in exchange for creating an army of pro-Obama election warriors?

A secure border? The leadership's "principles" will embrace the myth that Obama can be trusted to "secure the borders" if Republicans create 8,000,000 new Obama voters. But it should tell you something that Democrats have steadfastly refused to condition amnesty on measurable border progress, determined by an objective arbiter.

If the anti-gun ObamaCare law has shown us anything, it is that the law is irrelevant to Barack Obama, when it impedes his political objectives. You would have to be delusional to assume that Obama will do anything to secure the border, once his "quid pro quo" is firmly in hand.

What about E-Verify (also known as "Healthcare.gov for Jobs")?

After the colossal failure of "government checks for guns" ("Brady Checks") and "government checks for insurance" (ObamaCare), one would have to be crazy to prohibit any American from getting a job until they had been checked out by an ObamaCare-type database.

The only difference between healthcare.gov and E-Verify is that (1) E-Verify is a much larger and more intrusive database and, (2) the consequences of its failure will be much more cataclysmic. Incidentally, even a maid, nanny, or baby sitter would have to receive government approval if the Senate bill became law.

AN ARMY OF OBAMA-LOBBYISTS

What about the kids? As we saw when they chanted Obama's campaign slogan, "Yes we can," from the Senate gallery, this is the most rabidly political demographic of all. Obama has made sure that these supporters will not be deported.

But as pro-gun senators found out after the defeat of the Manchin-Toomey gun control amendment in April, these rabid “Obamaistas” will make their lives miserable. If all doubt about future deportation is removed, no Republican congressman can expect to ever again enjoy a peaceful town hall meeting (or breakfast at a local diner), but they will find these activists being bused around the country to cower conservative legislators into supporting the entire agenda of the Left -- including gun control!

There is one final benefit for Obama in cowing the House to bring up immigration, and it is perhaps the most important consideration of all: Once the House falls into Obama's "immigration trap," it takes attention away from the collapsing, anti-gun ObamaCare program and changes the national conversation to another issue.

The bottom line: There is a reason why Barack Obama and his "puppet press" have been campaigning for a year to force the Republican House to wade into "immigration reform." It is nothing but benefits for anti-gun politicians, and nothing but pain for pro-gun legislators.

Who would be stupid enough to inflict that level of pain on themselves?

 

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

 

Their is several other topics that those with their heads in the sand consider picking on AZ G&F. The feces starts at the top!!!! And the cancer has been infecting state and local forms of gooberment. AZ G&F has tiny problems in comparison but is living proof they all will do as they please. Keep your heads in the sand and you will get ultimately what ya never wanted, but got shoved down your throats.

 

 

 

Take care, Willie

[Guest wdenike]

Thursday, 06 February 2014 15:35

Written by Mike Hammond

Will the Next Surgeon General be an Anti-gun Fanatic?

Earlier this week, Senators grilled the latest anti-gun nominee that President Obama has put forward: Dr. Vivek Murthy, who was nominated to be the next Surgeon General of the United States.

Make no mistake about it: Murthy is an anti-gun fanatic. Not only that, as Surgeon General, Murthy could channel huge amounts of taxpayer dollars to "junk science studies" intended to prove that guns should be banned.

During his hearing this week, Murthy alleged that gun control would not be his "priority." But he did not say he would not spend money on something he is already on record as characterizing as a "health issue." (See examples of his intense anti-gun views below.)

Also, don’t forget Justice Sonia Sotomayor, who gave us all of these promises of neutrality and then, when confirmed, couldn't brace gun control fast enough. Senators should not make the same mistake with Murthy.

It appears the Murthy nomination is a central component to the new strategy of Bloomberg-type groups to use junk science produced with taxpayer dollars to discourage gun ownership. See the article that discusses this strategy here.

Murthy is co-founder and president of Doctors for America, an Obama-linked organization which has gone to great lengths to push gun control. Both Murthy’s personal assistant and press secretary are fellows at a Leftist "think tank" supported by financier George Soros.

The Twitter feed of @vivek_murthy leaves no doubt about how eager the Obama nominee is to restrict gun rights.

1. Vivek Murthy @vivek_murthy Apr 21

Signs of progress-we got 20 votes in the senate in favor of gun violence legislation that we wouldn’t have had 1 year ago. Have faith #dr4a

2. Vivek Murthy @vivek_murthy Apr 21

Docs fired up to keep fighting for gun safety laws @Drsforamerica natl conference with @haroldpollack Brina Milikowsky, Eric Fleegler #dr4a

3. Vivek Murthy @vivek_murthy 21 Dec 2012:

NRA press conference disappointing but predictable - blame everything in the world except guns for the Newtown tragedy. #wakeup

After the shooting in Newtown, Murthy’s group authored an open letter to Obama that urged restrictions on gun rights in the name of the medical profession, stating:

It’s time for common sense gun rules like background checks and banning assault weapons and high-capacity magazines, as well as a comprehensive plan to address gun violence including ensuring funding for research and data-collection on gun violence and ensuring that health care providers can ask patients about gun ownership in order to counsel them appropriately about safety measures.

For all the foregoing reasons, Gun Owners of America OPPOSES the nomination of Vivek Murthy to be Surgeon General of the United States and will score Senate votes in favor of his nomination as anti-Second Amendment votes.

 

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

 

 

 

Head in sand? or head in hind end that is the question? Those that pay attention are considered PARANOID. Those that tow the line and think the ole gooberment is taking care of them. ( Including the wildlife unfortunately ). Are considered _ _ _ _ s you fill in the blanks. If you snooze you will lose :o .

 

 

 

 

Take care, Willie