Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
m77

Federal Lands Tag

Recommended Posts

Here is how ownership in Arizona breaks down:

 

42.1% Federal lands

27.6% Tribal lands

12.7% State Trust lands

16.6% Private lands

 

Arizona's federal lands are under the jurisdiction of the Department of Defense, Bureau of Land Management, National Forest Service, National Park Service, Bureau of Reclamation, and the Fish and Wildlife Service.

 

Bill Quimby

 

 

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is how ownership in Arizona breaks down:

 

42.1% Federal lands,

27.6% Tribal lands,

12.7% State Trust lands, and

16.6% Private lands.

 

Arizona's federal lands are under the jurisdiction of the Department of Defense, Bureau of Land Management, National Forest Service, National Park Service, Bureau of Reclamation, and the Fish and Wildlife Service.

 

--- Bill Quimby

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have to agree, AZ probably has the best overall elk hunts. Antler number size etc taken all into account. Even with increasing tag numbers and azgfd selling more tags instead of managing for quality, there are still great units for quality and other units for quanity. I do wish they would reduce the cow tags tho. Seems like too many. But on the topic, I don't think a federal tag is the way to go. Fed tag the funding goes to the fund to spend on crap like fast and furious, at least keeping it with the agency will stay amongst azgfd

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I could see it now... there would be a website for the Federal Draw and it would be created by the same company that created the ObamaCare website...

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
/>

If you like your elk tag you can keep your elk tag

hahaha!!! Nobody's trying to take your elk tag away, we're just trying to make sure everyone has the same opportunity to the elk tag. If you pre existing conditions (poaching or what not) you can still have your elk tag!!
  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is almost insulting. From your first post to your follow up comments of us not being open minded enough and there not being economics in it for the hunter. Surely you are being sarcastic...

No one in their right mind can say there are no economics in hunting. There are vast amounts of money, budgeting, investing, and other practices that all fall under the realm of economics in hunting. From the hunter who hunts the game, to the agency who "manages" the game, economics is a major driving force that either allows us to hunt, or not.

 

Open Minded enough? You have to be either ignorant or not live here to see the effects of getting the federal govt involved with not only managing species of animals but managing the lands. The negative results are astounding and numerous. Many threads before this point out reasons not to get the federal govt involved.

 

Bottom line, this idea is horrible. Either you don't know what you are saying or you are enjoying watching the thread light up. I really hope for your sake, it is the latter. Way to get the fire started though. I do believe those of us that love the outdoors need to continue to be vigilant in making sure this particular scenario is never even close to becoming a reality. The ESA is bad enough and in my personal opinion, needs to be scrapped, based on "economics."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest wdenike

Do ya think along with Obama phones and Obama care there would be a chance to get Obama GUNS????? :o Just sayin Ya never know :blink: :rolleyes:

 

 

 

Take care, Willie

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×