ZBAR Report post Posted May 1, 2013 I was surprised to see the success rates on these hunts, especially for unit 27. It was 12%. That's low! Unit 23 was 60% which is good, but I thought it would be higher. I had the 23 late tag & killed a nice buck towards the end of the hunt but my brother never filled his tag. It was a lot tougher than I anticipated. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Eagle Eye Report post Posted May 1, 2013 I like that buck. did you score him? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
azslim Report post Posted May 1, 2013 IMO it is harder to get a good desert mule deer than a good coues Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Snapshot Report post Posted May 1, 2013 I was surprised to see the success rates on these hunts, especially for unit 27. It was 12%. That's low! Unit 23 was 60% which is good, but I thought it would be higher. I had the 23 late tag & killed a nice buck towards the end of the hunt but my brother never filled his tag. It was a lot tougher than I anticipated. Agree. I was really surprised on that unit 27, 12% success. I thought it would be in the 50% range, at least? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Tines Report post Posted May 1, 2013 I don't see how ANY published success rates are accurate with the current system. On the bright side, no more archery deer reporting!! We're moving forward... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DesertBull Report post Posted May 1, 2013 with only 25 tags it only takes a 2-3 people not reporting their success to throw the % WAY off. I would not put too much into the published rates 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ZBAR Report post Posted May 1, 2013 I would say they're pretty accurate. There were only 25 tags in unit 27, so even if 2-3 people didn't return their surveys (assuming those people filled their tags) the success rate would still be low for a rut hunt. Honestly, the G&F has made it incredibly easy to report harvest results. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CouesRanger Report post Posted May 2, 2013 Very nice buck Congrats! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
111 Report post Posted May 2, 2013 Unit 27 with a 12% success rate on a rut hunt is pretty surprising. If all hunters reported their success only three hunters were successful, sounds like a tough hunt! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MULEPACKHUNTER Report post Posted May 2, 2013 Unit 27 in december the deer move quite a bit form my experience so even if you fond them scouting or durring archery in aug they won't be there later on.. I have a photo of a buck I saw and then got another one of the same animal 9 miles away later in the year Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Snapshot Report post Posted May 2, 2013 Unit 27 in december the deer move quite a bit form my experience so even if you fond them scouting or durring archery in aug they won't be there later on.. I have a photo of a buck I saw and then got another one of the same animal 9 miles away later in the year I can certainly believe that. I have seen bucks earlier in the year, that were nowhere to be found during the late archery hunt. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SunDevil Report post Posted May 2, 2013 stastically speaking, in order to achieve a 95% confidence level with a +/- 5% confidence interval, 24 hunters out of 25 would need to report their harvest information. whereas with a hunt that offers 800 tags, only 260 would need to report. was the game and fish following up with all 25 hunters to get their harvest info? if not, I doubt they had 24 hunters report. pretty much same holds for other dec hunts that only offer 40 - 50 tags. I have been saying for years they need to make reporting mandatory like other states do but apparently they either have some statisticians with PhDs working for them or they are comfortable reporting funny numbers that really do not mean anything at all. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites