DesertBull Report post Posted May 2, 2006 Matt Bratz LOL! Did you make that name up? Either way, it sounds like it fits. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
muley Report post Posted May 2, 2006 I Agree, although I have a few other names for him, if I wasn't a gentlemen. Oh well, what goes around, comes around. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
muleybull Report post Posted May 2, 2006 Good ol' Arizona Game and Fish. I am familliar with this case, and still think things were a lot out of control. This is one of the reasons I have lost all support for them. If you want further proof of thier support for the hunter, look at the 2006 hunt regs. I hunt a lot in northern AZ. I hunt deer a lot in unit 18A. They upped the tags to 600. I will kiss your hind end if you can count 600 different deer in that unit. Heck, I'll even give you a 400 head spread. Not only will there be 600 deer hunters in this unit, but at the same time there will be over 600 limited opportunity elk hunters in there, with the possiblilty of another 150 population management tags. Again, all at the same time. Still think they like hunting or hunters. Ask yourself why would anyone want an archery elk tag. Chance to kill a huge bull right. The old dates on the hunt made it hard to find a bull that wasnt all busted up, so they backed it up later. Should make it easier to kill a huge bull with their antlers intact. On a lighter note, beat them at their own game. If you dont kill a deer or elk, keep your tag in case you find a deadhead. Could be the one you lost during your hunt..............right? I guess that makes it yours. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
muley Report post Posted May 3, 2006 AMEN BROTHER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites