Big Tub Report post Posted February 5, 2012 There are a lot of loopholes and loophole jumpers in life. You need to go to a Judge to interpret the intent of the rule/law. I dont know why you want to work so hard to get another pig tag. Take a kid hunting if you want to go again. It will be more fun. Most of the interpretation of laws is under "what a reasonable person would interpret the law to be" at least in all the cases I've been involved in. Just my 1/2 cent worth. In my experience the interpretation of laws is pretty much up to the officer that has his ticket book out ... G&F have been very consistent with "NO" on this interpretation of only 1 permit-tag except if there are multiple draws. As I mentioned on some of the other outdoor sites: it is a good time to move on getting this changed -- the commission is welcoming lots of new rules right now. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BigGameHunter Report post Posted February 6, 2012 As you and I both know, it's not about the pig tag. I just know that if it were one of us in the field, misinterpeting the law, we would be issued a ticket (even if their computers were down) right on the spot. Also, rest assured, my kids do hunt/fish with me ... There are a lot of loopholes and loophole jumpers in life. You need to go to a Judge to interpret the intent of the rule/law. I dont know why you want to work so hard to get another pig tag. Take a kid hunting if you want to go again. It will be more fun. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dalbo413 Report post Posted February 15, 2012 I ran into this same problem last year trying to get a leftover javi tag after I was unsuccessful on the archery hunt. I agree, they should change the wording, or their interpretation of the the wording to allow for the purchase of an additional tag if the annual bag limit hasn't been filled by a hunter. It seems like it would be a win-win-win, more tag money, more hunter opportunity, more happy hunters. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
