runningbird Report post Posted February 2, 2012 So is the ADA going to take stance on this bill? They are either for it or against it. And is the ADA going to keep bowing down to AZSFW and paying them dues? If we want to cut AZSFW out, we need to cut their cash flow, starting with all of the groups that are members of AZSFW... So let's get board members of all the wildlife groups to come on here and let us know where their group stands on this. The ADA has not taken a stance on the bill. We were given a preliminary overview of what the bill was and what it would accomplish. The board asked for more information and the "devil in the details". Since we did not see the bill prior to the dropping in the state legislature and since there was a response that mandated not moving it forward, there will be no vote on an item that is moot. As far as membership, the ADA is not a member of the AZSFW. We are however a member of the AZSFWC. The purpose of the "C" is to have a forum for sportsmen, meet monthly to discuss items of interest, meet with the AZGFD (They come every month and brief us on what is current) and then review proposals for the spending of the wildlife plate monies. The ADA, the AES, the AAF and the ADBSS have in the past funded the lobbyist efforts of Capitol Consulting (Suzanne Gilstrap). That process will be up for review, pending any decisions as to the future of the AZSFW. Please feel free to ask any more questions. So who gave the preliminary overview of the bill? will we ever be told the answer to this? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
.270 Report post Posted February 2, 2012 not from pbj or the sfw guys he gets his marching orders from. he has selective answering disease. he only answers the questions the sfw guys select. Lark. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
