CouesWhitetail Report post Posted December 9, 2010 On the other hand.....Scott Adams 124 inch buck seems to only be 5 years old based on tooth wear. But there was a burn in that area probably a year and a half before Scott killed him and the regrowth probably helped a ton with nutrition and it was a great antler year (meaning good rains and thus good vegetation growth) in general that year. I think Scott's buck would have gotten even larger as a 7-8 year old. It takes three things to make a great buck....Age, Nutrition, and Genetics. and we know Scott's buck was a beast the year before too! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jamaro Report post Posted December 9, 2010 Mike... Sounds to me like we need to get that old buck killed... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
firstcoueswas80 Report post Posted December 9, 2010 On the other hand.....Scott Adams 124 inch buck seems to only be 5 years old based on tooth wear. But there was a burn in that area probably a year and a half before Scott killed him and the regrowth probably helped a ton with nutrition and it was a great antler year (meaning good rains and thus good vegetation growth) in general that year. I think Scott's buck would have gotten even larger as a 7-8 year old. It takes three things to make a great buck....Age, Nutrition, and Genetics. and we know Scott's buck was a beast the year before too! If only Scott would have passed... I know I would have!! hahahahah!!!!! yeah right! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CouesWhitetail Report post Posted December 9, 2010 yea....I wish he would have passed too That buck had some knubs that looked like they might have become drop tines in the future. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TREESTANDMAN Report post Posted December 11, 2010 Great info! Jason- This year I think he is a 125-130 class buck! Mike Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
