Landowner Tags

[wildwoody]

Who's the king?

[Explorer]

14 minutes ago, wildwoody said:

Who's the king?

I know who the queen is

[wildwoody]

WTF. I bet you do sweetheart.

[CatfishKev]

1 hour ago, Explorer said:

When you have to much God said you should share 

Not sure what happened there when I went to post my reply It look like I was replying to the wrong post. 

But you are right, however God doesn't ask you to be a doormat either (referring to the food bank comment). Even Jesus set boundaries as well as does God. Something I've seen a lot of Christians including my parents not know when to draw the line.  Just saying don't let yourself get trampled on and abused.  

[Explorer]

Thank you.

 

[Oakley]

Az is a fence out state. If the ranchers don’t want the  wildlife on their property then fence them out  land owner tags should not be even a topic.  All wild game in AZ belong to the people.  Some  Ranch owners  are crying predators are killing our livestock but try to get permission to call or trap on that same land..

[4huntrs]

12 hours ago, stillatmaxpoints said:

The landowner does not own the game animal but they do supply water and browse and grazing for wildlife, water is the key, most of the units in northern Az especially the coconino plateau was devoid of water and wildlife in the 1800's until the ranching ventures developed waters for livestock, early explorers verify that.

And Game and Fish provides gates, miles of poly pipe and water hole projects that helps cattle and wildlife. Our money from licensing and tag fees.

[wildwoody]

1 hour ago, Oakley said:

Az is a fence out state. If the ranchers don’t want the  wildlife on their property then fence them out  land owner tags should not be even a topic.  All wild game in AZ belong to the people.  Some  Ranch owners  are crying predators are killing our livestock but try to get permission to call or trap on that same land..

Never had a problem getting permission, just have to go to the door. Can't kill wolves.

[firstcoueswas80]

2 hours ago, Oakley said:

Az is a fence out state. If the ranchers don’t want the  wildlife on their property then fence them out  land owner tags should not be even a topic.  All wild game in AZ belong to the people.  Some  Ranch owners  are crying predators are killing our livestock but try to get permission to call or trap on that same land..

Agree 100%, this reminds me of ranchers in TX who are "decimated" by the feral hogs..... but want $500 for a 150# hog. No thanks. Keep crying. 

[thegunsmith2506]

14 hours ago, stillatmaxpoints said:

The landowner does not own the game animal but they do supply water and browse and grazing for wildlife, water is the key, most of the units in northern Az especially the coconino plateau was devoid of water and wildlife in the 1800's until the ranching ventures developed waters for livestock, early explorers verify that.

That make zero sense. Where do you get your information? 

[wildwoody]

1 minute ago, thegunsmith2506 said:

That make zero sense. Where do you get your information? 

Who else dug the water holes? The elk, nope ranchers. Maybe the Indians.

[thegunsmith2506]

3 minutes ago, wildwoody said:

Who else dug the water holes? The elk, nope ranchers. Maybe the Indians.

So man made water is all the exists? Nope!

[wildwoody]

Man dug water holes. Not following besides you don't like ranchers. I don't care either way. But some people are awfully concerned about other peoples property. That was a great song.

[firstcoueswas80]

3 hours ago, wildwoody said:

Man dug water holes. Not following besides you don't like ranchers. I don't care either way. But some people are awfully concerned about other peoples property. That was a great song.

I dont think its the other peoples property that's in question. It's the critters on the land that we own, and the private property owner being able to sell our animals for profit.

[HuntHarder]

Easy to see who owns land on here and who doesn't.  If I owned a large ranch I would want a land owner tag.  Non-transferable and only valid for your land.  That is how some states do it and I completely agree with it.  Now, if you restrict wildlife from coming and going freely, then no.