Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
wildwoody

Whats my score

Recommended Posts

Well my friend here needs help with his score. Will add pics as we go..

 

IMG_4437.jpg

IMG_4415.jpg

  • Like 1
  • Wow! 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Eli said:

Cool looking deer, regardless the score. Lot of character 

Yes sir, I really don't care, but with  first 2 scores of mass are at 8 inches each both sides so was wondering the possibilities.

So what's everyone's thoughts ??

WIN_20241103_17_57_34_Pro.jpg

WIN_20241103_17_58_31_Pro.jpg

  • Wow! 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, wildwoody said:

Yes sir, I really don't care, but with  first 2 scores of mass are at 8 inches each both sides so was wondering the possibilities.

So what's everyone's thoughts ??

Really??? 8" is giant!! thats awesome. giant mass with some extras. Sure big enough to shoot. very cool

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, wildwoody said:

42"s of mass.  

WIN_20241103_17_56_54_Pro.jpg

WIN_20241103_17_56_24_Pro.jpg

If the first two circumferences (H1 & H2) are 8” on both sides, that is 32”. The next 4 circumferences (H3 & H4) must be approximately 5” each, which would make the total mass 52”, not 42”….pretty outstanding 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Taking your mass #s.

167 gross

156 net

Weak forks, not overly wide, decent G2s, decent mains.

Cool old buck.  With that mass, he has to be old and on his way down.  Was he aged?  8.5 years old?

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, wildwoody said:

Yes sir, I really don't care, but with  first 2 scores of mass are at 8 inches each both sides so was wondering the possibilities.

So what's everyone's thoughts ??

WIN_20241103_17_57_34_Pro.jpg

WIN_20241103_17_58_31_Pro.jpg

 

You are saying the first 2 mass measurements on each beam was over 8"  for a total of 32" with 42" of total mass? If that's the case the final 4 mass measurements average 2.5"? Beam doesn't suggest that whatsoever. Are your #'s correct? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Big or Bust said:

 

You are saying the first 2 mass measurements on each beam was over 8"  for a total of 32" with 42" of total mass? If that's the case the final 4 mass measurements average 2.5"? Beam doesn't suggest that whatsoever. Are your #'s correct? 

Ya sounds right but not. 

1000004186.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×