Jump to content
bowhunter-tw

Interesting overpressure sign

Recommended Posts

What kind of powder were you using and how many grains, and how close to the lands, and what bullet?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
44 minutes ago, 10Turkeys said:

What kind of powder were you using and how many grains, and how close to the lands, and what bullet?

260rem, IMR4350, 41.5gr, 143gr eldx, I might have been into the lands. I just re checked and I only had a .005” jump on the few that were still loaded. Theres a chance that one was seated long

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The best way to know if you have a max load situation is to monitor the head expansion. Head expansion over .0008" is an indication of an over maximum load. It is not good for your brass or your rifle. Measure just above the extractor slot on the case head and use a micrometer or a caliper with a .0001" resolution. You should make a note of the case head dimension at the start of your load development in case you have a situation like this where you need to know what case head expansion is. I'm sure that case with the primer leak has an over expanded head. You may want to try reducing that load a bit and backing off on the seating depth as well. By the way did you wet tumble those cases?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, L Cazador said:

The best way to know if you have a max load situation is to monitor the head expansion. Head expansion over .0008" is an indication of an over maximum load. It is not good for your brass or your rifle. Measure just above the extractor slot on the case head and use a micrometer or a caliper with a .0001" resolution. You should make a note of the case head dimension at the start of your load development in case you have a situation like this where you need to know what case head expansion is. I'm sure that case with the primer leak has an over expanded head. You may want to try reducing that load a bit and backing off on the seating depth as well. By the way did you wet tumble those cases?

Do you mean 8 thou? (.008”) 8 tenths is so small my calipers probably wont measure that accurately. I did not wet tumble. Max load on this is 42.9 C my COL keeps this load from being compressed

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, bowhunter-tw said:

Do you mean 8 thou? (.008”) 8 tenths is so small my calipers probably wont measure that accurately. I did not wet tumble. Max load on this is 42.9 C my COL keeps this load from being compressed

Not 8 thou, 8 ten thousands. Thats less than one thousandths of an inch. When you have hit one thousandths (.001") of an inch you have over expanded the case head and your resizing die may not bring the case back into a proper dimension. And if you caliper doesn't have that resolution you may want to think about investing in a caliper that does. Mitutoyo, Starrett, or Fowler can be found with .0001" resolution.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, L Cazador said:

Not 8 thou, 8 ten thousands. Thats less than one thousandths of an inch. When you have hit one thousandths (.001") of an inch you have over expanded the case head and your resizing die may not bring the case back into a proper dimension. And if you caliper doesn't have that resolution you may want to think about investing in a caliper that does. Mitutoyo, Starrett, or Fowler can be found with .0001" resolution.

Good to know, wouldnt have figured it was that sensitive. I probably should get some nicer calipers. Will check when im home from work. I appreciate the info

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, bowhunter-tw said:

Do you mean 8 thou? (.008”) 8 tenths is so small my calipers probably wont measure that accurately. I did not wet tumble. Max load on this is 42.9 C my COL keeps this load from being compressed

I saw this happen to a friend last year. When we checked the head diameter expansion it was over 1 1/2 thousands expanded. That load was 3 grains under max. Brass capacity, bore, and powder lot all play a big role. I recommend you do a powder ladder first and find your the maximum for that brass, bullet, primer, and rifle. Proceed in increments of .3 tenths powder weight until you hit .0005" head expansion. That will be the maximum load for that combo of components.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, L Cazador said:

Not 8 thou, 8 ten thousands. Thats less than one thousandths of an inch. When you have hit one thousandths (.001") of an inch you have over expanded the case head and your resizing die may not bring the case back into a proper dimension. And if you caliper doesn't have that resolution you may want to think about investing in a caliper that does. Mitutoyo, Starrett, or Fowler can be found with .0001" resolution.

I've seen digital calipers with 4 decimal place readouts, but they only are good for 5 tenths resolution. If you want to measure head expansion I think you should be looking at a micrometer.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 hours ago, Mike S said:

I've seen digital calipers with 4 decimal place readouts, but they only are good for 5 tenths resolution. If you want to measure head expansion I think you should be looking at a micrometer.

Mike I agree with you there are some instruments out there that are not going to do the job. While I certainly would recommend a blade micrometer for the job of measuring head expansion it may not be an option for someone on a budget. I'd rather recommend investing in a high quality caliper like the Mitutoyo IP67 which has a resolution of .0001" and accurately does the job.  I use a blade micrometer that measures to .00001" but my Mitutoyo IP67 does the job equally well. Both of the units in the picture are in the $200 range.

IMG_6350.JPG

IMG_6351.JPG

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That does look like a quality caliper, but I still think the caliper by design design is unsuited for .0001" resolution and all of those I've seen show a digital readout of 0 or 5 for the 4th decimal. Are you saying yours shows .0001, .0002 etc.? Id hate for a member to buy something that didn't meet his expectations is all. Yours looks a lot like this one.

 

9096071_Screenshot(20).thumb.png.a035a091bb847b50a898500bba6e139c.png394523086_Screenshot(19).thumb.png.a8697426b13bec423e5bfe65337c823d.png

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
24 minutes ago, Mike S said:

That does look like a quality caliper, but I still think the caliper by design design is unsuited for .0001" resolution and all of those I've seen show a digital readout of 0 or 5 for the 4th decimal. Are you saying yours shows .0001, .0002 etc.? Id hate for a member to buy something that didn't meet his expectations is all. Yours looks a lot like this one.

 

9096071_Screenshot(20).thumb.png.a035a091bb847b50a898500bba6e139c.png394523086_Screenshot(19).thumb.png.a8697426b13bec423e5bfe65337c823d.png

Don't know if that's the same. There are a lot of Chinese copies buy only Japanese made ones. That looks like it's accurate to .0005". So if you're measuring a head diameter it could be off enough to not detect a .0005" head expansion. When measuring something to this dimension it's important everything is clean including the measuring blades. Also another thing that's critical in using a caliper . since it doesn't have a ratchet you should close the caliper gently till it stops to avoid crushing the dimension.  Check country of origin on the ad if it doesn't state that don't buy it. I check my Mitutoyo caliper regularly and it's always dead nuts on! And yes it reads to .0001"

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×