Hunterjohnny Report post Posted January 23, 2009 Looks like my marrige license. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ghost hunter Report post Posted January 24, 2009 Yep, that's what I saw before the election. Topics were very clear, everything else was so blurry you couldn't make heads nor tails of it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NRS Report post Posted January 24, 2009 I could not read the document as it was to fuzzy. Went to the source to look at it and found the following. Never did find the original post Look at Amendment V. Here is the NEW Obama Bill of Rights! The less confining one! Since the Constitution is a living, breathing document, feel free to add on your own amendments comrades! Amendment I Confining Version Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances. Non Confining Version Congress shall respect no one’s religion except the worship of The One. All speech shall be free and fair under the Fairness Doctrine and anyone who questions The One shall be cut off from any further interviews. Since The One shall redress all grievances, there is no need for assemblies or complaining to the government since all will be well. Amendment II Negative Rights Version A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed. Positive Rights Version Guns are bad and all bitter clingers who own them shall turn them over to The One. Amendment III Restrictive Version No soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law. Non Restrictive Version We shall have no more standing army and any UN Peacekeeper who wants to treat your house like a European Youth Hostile is more than welcome to it. Amendment IV Negative Liberty Version The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized. Positive Liberty Version The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized, unless these people ask The One a difficult question or criticize his policies in any way. If this happens, all records, history and private life of any citizen, public or private, are free to be broken into and posted on the internet, broadcast on TV or printed in the paper. Amendment V Non Redistributive Version No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of war or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation. Redistributive Version All Gitmo prisoners shall be set free. Amendment VI AmeriKKKa Version In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the state and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the assistance of counsel for his defense. Obama Version The One shall appoint as many liberal judges as speedily as he wishes and the need for a defense shall not be necessary because if you are committed of a crime the judges can’t sentence you to jail time because time in jail may conflict with your new job as a professor at a US college. Amendment VII Bitter, Clinger version In suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise reexamined in any court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law. The One's Way Anyone who has $20 left after Obama redistributes the wealth shall be killed by a jury of his peers. However, you can only kill that person once. Amendment VIII Racist European Version Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted. New Version Arresting anyone is bad and if you committed a crime, it was probably because society forced you into it. Guilty as sin, free as a bird. Amendment IX Constraining Version The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people. Non Constraining Version Every citizen of the world, especially foreign terrorists and illegal immigrants are covered by this document. Amendment X Restrictive Version The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people. Freed Version All power of government shall be held by the Obamasiah to redistribute wealth as he sees fit and any power not defined by this or any other document shall also be held by the Obamasiah. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Rembrant Report post Posted January 29, 2009 Excuse me guys, I clearly heard Obama say what he wanted to do: He said he wanted to "distribute the wealth", and "fundamentally change this country". And guess what? He's already on the fast track Fundamentally change this country???!!!! Whoah! Mike Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Coach Report post Posted January 29, 2009 C'mon, it's only a TRILLION dollars he wants to hand out to his friends for getting him elected despite his utter lack of experience or qualifications. You didn't really think that kinda stuff happens for free, didja? Besides, just how much inflation can wasting a trillion dollars on pork projects cause anyway? Isn't it worth having "change"? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hunterjohnny Report post Posted January 29, 2009 Here is the "change" I see coming... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
