newbee Report post Posted January 13, 2005 Quick poll :who would throw $20 extra on a hunting lic,if it entered you into a drawing for coues-muley-elk-buffalo-big horn- prong horn ..sh%t jackalopes. I would, in a heart beat!! >quick over view- out of towners are whining about increase of tag fees" lawyer >says its un-fair" I say keep our tags and raffle em off If you get drawn you get a >tag reguardless if you have filled one already or not (except for buffalo-sheep) 2nd how much extra would ya pitch in?.. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ultramag Report post Posted January 13, 2005 well i think i would to.Thats why i strongly agree with suspending the internet app it sucks,but think about it. before uso would apply the apps for the their hunter. this way they would have to front the money themselfs up front.I think that would change a lot. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ultramag Report post Posted January 13, 2005 not sure if thats what you meant Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Red Rabbit Report post Posted January 13, 2005 Eliminating nonresident tags is the wrong direction to go for a variety of obvious reasons. Sure, we may be upset with USO, George Taulman, his guides and his lawyers, but this is not the solution. I wish I had the solution. Doug / Red Rabbit Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
az4life Report post Posted January 14, 2005 Taulman and his band of jerks are scum of the earth. I say let anyone EXCEPT him in. Find some way to use the Indian Reservation fees for out of staters. Indians can charge whatever they want. Soverign nation crap, why don't the lawyers go after them. Seems a bit like a cop chasing 2 speeders. He catches the guy at 10mph over and passes on the guy at 50mph over cause it is easier. Lets rev this non resident fee structure up to match the Reservations! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
hunterdude Report post Posted January 14, 2005 Az should charge the surrounding states NM, UT, CO, CA, an additional $25 on top of the non res fee. Missouri does that and get away with it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
newbee Report post Posted January 14, 2005 aside from me being pissed ,I feel that non residents should be alowed to hunt aswell, but its not the average joe coming here.the average joe isnt taking up a law suit.its a spoiled litle rich B%tch that thinks every one else owes them something- its like giving a starving person a meal and them complaining that there's no mayo! ***the amount of money that they are spending on lawyers would have covered the out of state fees and then some. (period) anyone here from G&F ??whats your take on this? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ultramag Report post Posted January 15, 2005 i DID NOT MEAN STOP OUT OF STATE HUNTERS. what i meant was stop the internet app or charge the money upfront.a good example is last year i put in for everything except buffalo.now i knew that i would not get drawn for everything.But it made more people put in like me, i think.Put in and figure out how to pay for it later.now i think that would stop some people. the bad side of this is that it hurts the not so well off people.just my thoughts......... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
