654321

I’ve got 2 good friends that guide so no problem with guides, just doesn’t break my heart when they get busted. My guess is the first time they got convicted is just the first time they got caught.

No defense for A3. Plenty of A3 guides have been busted by AZGFD so your special treatment of A3 is garbage. Here's the bottom-line Adams and his client are on a "buck of a lifetime" Nicks own words. They determine the only way to kill the buck is to shoot from the road and it was at that time they choose to break the rules and shoot from the road rather than let the buck go.

Is that what happened because I wasn’t there and never heard the story, you

Did he take it off the Rez or client

Was the elk in his possession or the clients

Key phrase there. Elk on the reservation. AZGFD doesn’t have any jurisdiction on the reservation. It was the feds that let Jed Larson off so easy.

Shane might lose his guides license before then, got caught flying a plane over the strip when he had a tag 2 years ago. Can find it in arizona public case lookup under David Koury. Kinda sad

Pretty sure John and his client were prosecuted and license lost.

No axe to grind, have never met either one, and I wish I could have watched the show.

These "highly successful guides or hunters" either pled guilty or were found guilty by a court of law. You don't end up in front of the commission any other way.

Looks like Steve Ward won't be hunting or guiding for the next 5 years.

They’re part of the problem not the only problem

I doubt habitat loss and the drought we’ve been having has anything to do with it.

Were you part of this hunt

https://azgfd-portal-wordpress-pantheon.s3.us-west-2.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/17111316/2025-Fall-Bonus-Point-Report.pdf

Bow means any hunting instrument designed for the purpose of propelling arrows which is drawn and held by and through the efforts of the person releasing, but does not include crossbow.

Pretty good chance the mens basketball team will be ranked #1.

ASU fans do have the woman's volleyball team.

Jul 1, 2025 – Jun 30, 2026 (3,6,7,10,21,22,23,24,26,27, 29,30,32,86,129,147) Open areas Statewide (excluding National Wildlife Refuges, Units 11M, 25M, 26M, 38M, and portions of Units 20B and 42) All mammals EXCEPT game mammals, fur-bearing mammals, predatory mammals, bats, coati, black-footed ferret, New Mexico jumping mouse, Gunnison’s prairie dog, black-tailed prairie dog, jaguar, jaguarundi, ocelot, otter, porcupine and wolves I guess Mountain Goat would fit under all mammals according to the AZGFD regulations.

AZ CUSTOM guide12AE is the rumor

7 Turkey tags and 6 pig tags for our group

Arizona Revised Statutes Annotated. Title 17. Game and Fish. Chapter 3. Taking and Handling of Wildlife. Article 1. General Regulations. § 17-316. Interference with rights of hunters; classification; civil action; exceptions Share | Primary Citation: A. R. S. § 17-316 Country of Origin: United States Last Checked: July, 2025 more + Historical: Summary: This law represents Arizona's hunter harassment law. Under the law, it is a class 2 misdemeanor for a person while in a hunting area to intentionally interfere with, prevent or disrupt the lawful taking of wildlife as defined under the law. It is a class 3 misdemeanor for a person to enter or remain on a designated hunting area on any public or private lands or waters or state lands including state trust lands with the intent to interfere with, prevent or disrupt the lawful taking of wildlife. "Incidental interference" arising from lawful activity by public land users is not unlawful under this section. A. It is a class 2 misdemeanor for a person while in a hunting area to intentionally interfere with, prevent or disrupt the lawful taking of wildlife by: 1. Harassing, driving or disturbing any wildlife. 2. Blocking, obstructing or impeding, or attempting to block, obstruct or impede, a person lawfully taking wildlife. 3. Erecting a barrier without the consent of the landowner or lessee with the intent to deny ingress to or egress from areas where wildlife may be lawfully taken. 4. Making or attempting to make physical contact, without permission, with a person lawfully taking wildlife. 5. Engaging in, or attempting to engage in, theft, vandalism or destruction of real or personal property. 6. Disturbing or altering, or attempting to disturb or alter, the condition or authorized placement of real or personal property intended for use in the lawful taking of wildlife. 7. Making or attempting to make loud noises or gestures, set out or attempt to set out animal baits, scents or lures or human scent, use any other natural or artificial visual, aural, olfactory or physical stimuli, or engage in or attempt to engage in any other similar action or activity, in order to disturb, alarm, drive, attract or affect the behavior of wildlife or disturb, alarm, disrupt or annoy a person lawfully taking wildlife. 8. Interjecting oneself into the line of fire of a person lawfully taking wildlife. B. It is a class 3 misdemeanor for a person to enter or remain on a designated hunting area on any public or private lands or waters or state lands including state trust lands with the intent to interfere with, prevent or disrupt the lawful taking of wildlife. C. The commission or any person properly licensed to take wildlife who is directly affected by a violation of this section may bring an action to restrain conduct declared unlawful in this section and to recover damages. D. A peace officer who reasonably believes that a person has violated this section may order the person to desist or to leave the area or arrest such person upon refusal to desist or leave. E. The conduct declared unlawful in this section does not: 1. Include any incidental interference arising from lawful activity by public land users, including ranchers, miners or recreationists. 2. Apply to landowners, permittees, lessees or their agents or contractors engaged in animal husbandry practices or agricultural operations. CREDIT(S) Added by Laws 1981, Ch. 239, § 1. Amended by Laws 2006, Ch. 128, § 1.

Hard to believe in 2005 I had max points which was 15 and could have had just about any tag in the state.

Good luck getting anything done with The Wild Horse and Burro act in place

Seems the only ones jumping on a name and damaging a reputation are guys from this site or AZGFD😂