654321

if i understand the proposal you can only get 1 tag through the draw and then the other one through first come first serve and only one tag per hunt number., not sure if you can get 2 tags for 2 diffferent hunt numbers through first come first serve, hope that makes sense

lots of critters in az. have a season but no limit

IMO the biggest difference is husted SELF-REPORTED, he still broke the law and as a resposible hunter he should have known the law in regards to taking a specific animal before he took it or helped take it. there are plenty of cases every hunting season where laws are broke and hunters self-report and they dont lose their lic. or get the book thrown at them.

go to GF web page it has the 9 page report all about it

sure see alot of comments about gov. regulation taking freedom away ect. don't see to many people complaining about the change that will allow 2 pigs a year, or the law passed last year that opened lots of public land around urban areas to hunting, some people excited about suprresor law passed and magazine capacity, I do think CWD is wrong way to try and say baiting is going to be the reason it gets here, Utah allows baiting and they have CWD doubt baiting is the reason they have it, Colorado no baiting guess what it probably started there or wy., new mexico has CWD, IMO when az. gets CWD it will be from a migrating deer from southern utah, az be better off building 14ft. fence around border to keep CWD out rather than ban baiting, if a harvest issue put units like 23 and 22 to draw to limit harvest, imo.

best guess is the change is to keep some pressure off mule deer, not to worrried about archery hunters hurting the whitetail in 34A

haven't hunted that unit in years but there used to be some big bucks, sure there still are