AverageJoe

I will NEVER use usps again.

Sorry bud just missed out on mine. By the way gunner still doing awesome!

Wow old buck!

True. But they never heard from him again. I don't use trail cams. I do have a quad that I putt around on occasion. Hope that makes me just half a girly man LOL!!! dang you girly men and half girly men...I use binos, rangefinders, quads, and high power rifles and modern bows. I like to hold out on the trail cams so I can tell myself I am still manly. HAHA

Brad Pitt took on a grizzly with just a knife. If he can do it and all you girly men with trail cams and quads cant, that is pretty sad. I myself prefer to stare em to death.

I hear t/c makes a nice rifle. I heard they shoot like a foot off on the first shot. Is that true?

Cant believe this website wont let you write He11 instead changes it to heck. Frikkin Gay!!!

Well that sucks. I would definitely raise a little heck at Remington over that one.

Did you make sure it isnt the mount that is crooked?

3500 2 years ago

Lol...seems that would be harder and more of a pain in the butt than just using good binos.

Stay away from the bergers if you want a good group. Shoot some hornady 139 and 162. If it doesnt group from one of those then something is definitely wrong. Bergers are very picky

Sorry to hear of this...and sorry for your loss

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAA....thats funny right there

Good post becker and nice pic to compare..

100-105 max. left g3 is ony 2". nice buck for sure

What do you mean by below your teeth? Tongue is behind your teeth so i am confused. I have had bumps before that were nothing and very common so trying to figure out what you mean. I had complications from chewing so i have quit

Or just give me $100 to get it dialed in for you and call it good.

Ill give you 1300 for the whole setup. Then when i have it shooting sub moa in a week you can buy it back for 1400...

Game and Fish Commission votes to support alternative on Mexican wolf conservation developed by large stakeholder partnership Posted in: News Media Apr 22, 2014 Share or Bookmark: Share on facebookShare on twitterShare on emailShare on favoritesShare on print|More Sharing ServicesMore Digg this story!Email this article Printer friendly page The Arizona Game and Fish Commission voted unanimously today to support an alternative developed by 28 cooperating agencies and stakeholders for the non-essential population rule that governs Mexican wolf conservation in Arizona and New Mexico. The proposal, which has an unprecedented level of stakeholder support, is being submitted to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) for consideration in its Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). While still conceptual, the alternative is scientifically-based and would further cooperation between federal and state agencies and stakeholders to achieve a self-sustaining wolf population. Key elements of the alternative include: Allowing up to triple the target number of Mexican wolves in the Southwest from the 1982 recovery plan’s goal of not less than 100 wolves to achieve a self-sustaining population. Major expansion of the area where wolves can be released to include the Secondary Recovery Zone. Expansion of the area where Mexican wolves can disperse and establish territories. Establishment of a connectivity corridor for wolves to disperse to the species’ core historical range in Mexico. Recognition of the importance of Mexico as a primary element to successful Mexican wolf recovery. “The biggest impediment to the Mexican wolf reintroduction effort in the Southwest isn’t biologically-based. It’s social tolerance for an apex predator on today’s modern landscape that must support such a wide variety of conservation, recreation and economic uses. This alternative represents the first time such a broad-based group has come together for Mexican wolf conservation, and it goes a long ways to enhancing social tolerance and, in turn, successful conservation of the species,” says J.W. Harris, chairman of the Arizona Game and Fish Commission. The alternative provides concepts that stakeholders want the Service to evaluate as it prepares the draft EIS that will eventually be opened to broad public review and comment.

Honestly we the people have the power and control of what we want in our state but you Cant be afraid of consequences if you really want to get something done. That is what the federal govt loves to push down our throat because they know people will comply rather than go to jail for a bit or be fined. IMO it is our duty to take things into our own hands when the govt starts pulling this BS There is zero need for wolves in any state in the west. We are the top predator and keep plenty of animals in check without the help of half breed wannabe wolves.

Awesome and congrats. I will never forget my first real bow. 2006 bowtech allegiance.

Well let me just be honest. You're a dick

☝not cool man Not cool at all.

LMAO...you just made my barley pop come out my nose "penetration is overrated in the archery world" thats the funniest dumb thing I've ever heard! I'll take 12" of dirt penetration every day over my arrow getting packed off by any critter. Besides arrows are easier to find when they are stuck in the dirt...thanks for the chuckle Glad you got a kick out of it! Now maybe reread and try to understand the point. If a 400 gn arrow gives plenty of penetration to achieve the desired pass through, why go to a 500 gn arrow? To get more penetration and a slightly less noisy bow right? Please tell me what more of a pass through achieves for you? When hunting, Accuracy and arrow time in flight are far more important than over penetrating! Faster flatter arrows are more accurate. That is why target/3d shooters shoot IBO weight arrows.