oz31p

A throw net will go as deep as you have rope connected to it. You don't sight them first you just throw it blind. Yes blue gill and carp. http://www.catfishedge.com/how-to-throw-cast-net/

I've done pretty good at Bartlet over the years. I catch all my bait with a throw net. I start looking for bait around the south ramp. If I need more I throw my net again near sb cove ramp. Then I head up the flats. This time of year till fall the flat heads are trolling the shallows looking for bat fish. I fish with large slip bobbers any where from 10-20 feet below to surface. Or less if its shallow. Just enough to keep my bait off the bottom. I use the cat fish stalker bobbers http://www.premierplasticsinc.com/bobbers/stalkers/catfish.php the 5oz will keep a 1lb carp from pulling it under. The key is big alive bait. My biggest was a 32lbs flatheads . I caught him on a 1lb carp in 8ft of water about 3 ft under a 5oz catfish stalker bobber.

You guys are putting the javelina on a pedestal. They are where they are just like every thing else. Get high and glass. A good deer spot is not necessarily a good javelina spot. Referring the them as pigs is seven years bad luck.

I skin them while hanging them from there hind legs. Then I take the front quarters then the backstrap a then the hind quarters. Then your done. No need to gut a javelina or any 4 legged critter.

http://ammomart.com/270-winchester-barnes-150gr-mrx-projectiles-50-count Hurry there's only 4 in stock

You guys beat me too it. Bret did a great job on my javelina

heck I thought the game was next weekend

I got mine

I remeber from talking with a Leupold rep . One of the main diferances between the mark 4 line and the VX line was the mark 4 have twin erector claws in the turret/redicl and the VX has a single arm.

The mark 4 4.5-14x40 30mm tube is listed on at 16oz

I really like the zeiss the zero stop turrets are nice but with the zero stop installed your limited to 16moa. In my case it's 750y. Which is plenty and but it's very heavy. So it work on my heavy gun The mk4 is just as capable exempt it has a Lower magnification and no zero stop but no limit on turret adjust ment But it weighs half what the Ziess weighs. . It works great on my light weight rifle. So much so that I have my light rifle and scope for sale right now but the more I think about it I may just keep the mk4 for my next ultra light weight build.

I'm on the west side and I have the Zeiss conquest HD5 5-25x50 and a Leupold mk4 LR/T 4.5-14x40. But with fine reticles if you wanted to look through them side by side

I have a Kifaru bikini with a nomad bag. When I'm using it as a day pack it's very narrow. Narrow enough to draw and shoot a bow.

That looks good. I think we need a separate custom knife show off thread, yes??

Ttt

I actually do, but Zeiss Conquests are still about half what I'd pay for Swaros. The Swaro pro deal is why I haven't ruled them out. If Swaros are better, I'll still pay that over Zeiss. The conquest are nice but they are half price for a reason. If you get the swaro 12 or 15s you'll never wonder what if.

Why don't you get a pro deal on Swarovski's?

I see a 100" coues buck beded in the bottom right corner.

+1Knew someone would pissed him off with thier ignorance. Shocker is was str8shot. Well not really. What a bunch of Nancy's I've been trying real hard to stay out of this topic but man... If you piss off azelkhunter2 you must be a real jerk off.

There's a couple of real cheap 110 and 111 on back page. Like 250 - 300

5bs

My 7year daughter shoots the infinte edge competitively. It's the perfect size and will grow with her for a long while

Swaro z3 Zeiss hd3 Leupold mark 4 Not necessarily in that order

6b

Clarified the description and updated the price for the rifle and scope together.