.270

i see ruger is making a 1911 .45 acp now. anybody handle one yet? i've been wanting to buy a 1911 made in 2011. was leaning toward a colt naturally, but the ruger is interesting. it is stainless, which is ok, but i'd rather have a blue one. anyway,if anyone has seen one, let's hear about it. hopefully it ain't like their side by side double shotgun that they only made a handfull of and took several years to get on the shelf. Lark.

I give up. After all the crap smack said to me after he was put up to it by these same guys. And you edit my post? Who's side are you on? You want us to all be fence riders? Sounds like azsfw has bought off somebody else. Lark.

Casey, what the he ll is that last sentence about? You need to get back to the banjo. Ruger has always built good rifles. Never had a problem with one. The '06 is good for anything. So is the .270. Same case, different bullets. Good luck. Lark.

It rained a bunch here in Nevada yesterday. Lark.

I don't care what the question is, giving rich guys a way to buy as many premium tags as they want isn't the answer. This bill is nothing more than a way the hamberlins and their buddies can get a bunch of tags every year, that any of us would love to have just one of, and then the money they spend on the tags goes straight to their pals the gilstraps, so they can lobby for more tags. It also takes the ability to manage wildlife away from the azgfd. Throw in their buddy don pee and his idea of privatizing wildlife and you really have a fiasco.

Me and krp are just jokin' with each other. At least I hope he is. Lark.

Why's everbuddy wanna kill me? Lark.

Moi? (muwah to folks in aj). Out here in bfc at this mine we're really big into acronyms. So I tried send one that just said xxxx. Dunno if it worked or not. So did this bill, that we were told was dead so many times, get any traction today? Or is it a secret? Lark.

Whoa! This guy don pee is something else. Lark.

Stanley, I agree with you. The sfw and their toadies, like pbj, are really big on trying to say the reason folks are against this bill is because of misconceptions in the way it was written. When the truth is that folks are pissed because it was a backdoor sorry attempt by rich guys to get even more premium permits and further limit Joe hunters chances on the process. Their ain't any way they could sugar coat this bucket o' poison to where folks will agree with it. Lark.

Don't apologize for outing a fink. We all knew pbj is a liar and a rat, now we have proof. And words are only as good as the man, too. This says a lot about why the ada hasn't issued any official statement. Lark. Proud member of the vocal minority.

It's good to see guys willing to get off the fence and take a defined stand with the good guys. Unlike others who either won't comment or wait until their business is about to fold and want to change teams. Good for Adams and Chappell. Lark. Proud member of the vocal minority.

My new 2nd favorite teams is the buff's. So what kinda excuses does who of a have now? Ever time ya lose to the devils ya always make some sorta excuse to not admit ya lost. Oh well. Humble pie with a side o' crow goes down real dry. . Lark. A proud member of the vocal minority.

If we knew all the behind the scenes crap going on we'd be amazed. Pbj's silence says a lot. The guy is a liar. The limp attempt at redemption by denham is just an attempt to cover his butt if azsfw loses. If they get something done this week he'll be on their side o' the fence jumping up and down and kissing hamberlins ring. And other body parts. Same with the triclops twins. I'm wondering what tag they promised weiers? One thing that needs to happen is to run moss and his butt kissers outta this state. He has been worse than cancer. All this auction tag crap needs to go away. Look at where it has gotten us. If they never had a tag auction we wouldn't be having this conversation. And before anyone says anything about how much "good" they do, can it. What "good" have they done? And use specifics. Not the shotgun crap with no hard facts to back it up that the tag grab supporters keep pukin' up. Lark. Proud member of the vocal minority.

The national bank of Arizona is a good one to boycott also. Lark.

Hamberlin, little Johnson, moss, don pee, smack, the triclops boys, denham, all the other rich guys, all these orifices need to join a 12 step program and all take a hike together off an 11 step pier. I really like how they assume anyone that doesn't like 2072 is uneducated and shouldnt be able to have an opinion. They are so sure of their superior intellect that a few paragraphs of crafty lingo is all it will take to win us over. Their aura of wisdom will blind us all to the truth. Take your money and go to Alaska or Utah. You're not going to win in Arizona. All you little business men who have lined up with 2072 get ready for bankruptcy. Because unless you figure out who supports you, that's where you're headed. Lark. Proud member of the so called vocal minority.

Get off the fence. Their is no neutral position on 2072. Lark.

Not having a position is the same as supporting it. If he was against it he would say he was. Get off the fence and either come over to the right side or you're on the same side as hamberlin and moss. Lark.

How when the devils win uofa always acts like it doesn't count? You bums lost. Live with it. Live in shame and misery, but live with it. Lark.

what a wonderful bunch of, well i can't think of a word i can use here that really describes em. trash maybe? we have to remove the head from the body. that's the only way a snake is safe. in this case, the heads. they're like a hydra. sfw has to shrivel up and die. we should make things hard enough that they leave us alone. i know a couple of the guys who's names have popped up as supporters of this deal. they ain't gonna want to ever talk to me again because i will not be civil. don't care where i see em or who is with em. i ain't ready to forgive. this next fall oughta be interesting in a lot of ways. after the uso deal, the next season was pretty stressfull for a lotta folks. especially uso and their hunters. they had to sub out a lotta their hunters, to more than willing outfitters that fall, for a lot of reasons, but mostly because folks hated em. there were a lot of confrontations and a lot of hard feelings over it. uso never recovered in Az. seldom see any of them around anymore. i know of a couple guys that "sub'd" out to em and they paid a hard price for quite awhile. be interesting to see if something similar happens over this deal. people need to boycott these guys. a lot of em are so rich it won't matter, but at least they won't be getting any of your money, that they can then turn around and use to try to get your tags. but some of these guys are really dependent on Az sportsmen and Az sportsmen need to be really critical of where they spend their money. i'd rather donate to al quida than these jokers. Lark.

wow, i'm impressed that uofa got that level of talent. now if you could schedule some games with woman teams............Lark.

They're just being good little toadies and lackies, doing what the boss tells em to do. The rich guys are the ol' sow and these guys are fightin' for the hind tit. Lark.

the door man in this high rise i'm stayin' in right now (penthouse no less and it overlooks the vegas strip) is a uofa grad. he hates my tips, but still takes em. he has to because he lost 50 bucks to me on the last ASU who of a baxketball game. life is hard, it's even harder when you're stupid, i mean a uofa fan. Lark.

i looked in the paper and watched espn and they all said asu won and who of a lost. even that commie tucson paper said it. why is it always irrelivant when asu wins? looooooooooooooooooosers. i'm suprised loser ain't spelled uofa. the kid with the helmet was just givin' a who of a player a brain transplant. gotta go, my pizza is here. gotta pay the uofa grad for it. Lark.

amanda, i delelted my own post? how do you do that? i posted it, then reread it after it came up. that i know of i never went to any screen that had a delete button on it. whatever. if i deleted it, i apologize for thinking badly of anyone. still don't see how it happened. i fired up my laptop tonight so i can see what i'm doing. been useing an iphone while out of town. when i get a chance i'll call you and splain some other things. heat, i can agree we are on the same team. and the game we're playing may be at halftime at best and we're behind by a few points and we don't have the ref's (politicians, the gov, rich guys that "own" the other team, etc) on our side. and if we win it will probably be on a hail mary or a field goal at the final gun. that's how tight this game is and it is for all the marbles. if we win, we can fight some more another day. but we will have to keep fighting. if they win, it's over. we're done. it won't be long until all tags will be for who has the most money. read what don peay, the guy who started all this stuff, says about the public owning wildlife. and i don't care what sfw says, he is a player in this too. anyway, so here we are in this tight game, at maybe halftime, playing our guts out, and one of the starters from the other team wants to quit and be on our side? he may not be the quarterback, but a starter. sounds a little funny to me. funny that all the sudden he wants to change sides during the game and funny that you would be willing to let him play for us. this pops up a lotta flags to me. like why won't he stick it out with the team he chose? why does he wanna be on our team now? he ain't playin' on my team. if denham is your friend, fine. i really don't care. outside of the issue of this bill, i couldn't care less about him. i don't need to read magazines or watch tv shows. they aren't important to me. but he knew about this stuff a long time before any of us did and he was blocking for it from the get go. the only reason he wants to swap jerseys is because it has hurt his business. and him and buncha other guides were already counting the money they planned on reaping from the tags that were going to be stolen from joe hunter. if he is truly serious about coming back on the side with the good guys, he needs to be a lot more forceful in his repudiation of 2072 and the folks that thunk it up. ryan's post pretty much sums up how i feel. he did a great job. i would bet that he had permission from his sfw bosses to turncoats. this is a real serious game, or should be, to anyone who can't afford to buy permits for 6 figures. and personally, i don't want anyone who was on the other team during the first half, on my team for the rest of the game. can you see my point. and if you want to give me english lessons, that's Bill Q's job. Lark.