DesertBull

If we are talking about the Constitution, then Ron Paul is the only candidate that is worthy. He is the only one that always votes to uphold the Constitution as it is written. Romney is a big gov't , big spender, douche bag. He loves Gov't provided and MANDATED healthcare. After all he crafted a similar plan himself. He has ground to stand on when bashing Obamacare. Ron Paul's voting record stand head and shoulders above anyone else's when it comes to person freedoms, small gov't, states rights and minding our own business when it comes to world affairs. I do NOT agree with him on everything, especially his stand on Israel. Ask a Supreme Court justice to show where abortion is legal in the Constitution. Even in their writings after Roe v Wade, they admitted it is not but it is implied. And if their premise that it's our body, we should do with it as we please, then why cant we get medical devices, treatments and drugs that other countries have? It's our body, we should choose, not the FDA. If it is our body, then why is the Gov't trying to tell us what we can and cannot eat, drink, etc? It's supposed to be MY choice. It's not about anyone's privacy or person choices. The personal choice was made at conception. IMO, abortion is one of the reasons we are declining. Just my opinion. That's why have the electron process. Anybody but the moron that currently occupies the White House is an improvement.

yeah....killing babies should be a non issue.

There is a bill going through the state legislature right now that would remove limits on ammo capacity.

Swell! Anyway to cut her off at the pass? Glue dollar to the ground and she'll spend all day trying to pick it up.

BONUS!

I will be writing in Ron Paul's name on my ballot.....again.

Gilstrap is speaking to the AZGFD Commission tomorrow

Nice of Hamberlin to supply a ready to cut and paste list of legislature contacts for us though. Much appreciated.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ We are asking for your opinion on HB 2072 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ The Arizona Bowhunters Association has been asked to provide a position statement on HB 2072 that was introduced by the Arizona Sportsman's for Wildlife. To say the least this has been a very hot topic in the sportsmen's community for the past couple months. The ABA needs your input to ensure that we are speaking for the vast majority of Bowhunters in Arizona. Please take the time to read through the following two links that details some of the pros and cons of HB2072. http://arizonasportsmenforwildlife.org/ Arizona Wildlife Federation Please reply to Carl Schottel carlschottel@gmail.com by March 12. Please let us know if you support or oppose this issue. Thanks for your continued support, Carl Schottel ABA Chairman

This subject needs media attention to get the word out. Maybe a bunch of us get together and picket the state capital or fish and game ? what ever works The Goldwater Institute. They are tax payer watch dogs and violating the gift cause of the AZ Constitution is right up their alley. They protected us from (the tax payer) from having to guarantee loans and buy some billionaire a hockey team. This tag grab is related in my opinion. Taking public assets and making them available to only a select few with money and political pull. Also, think Fiesta Bowl and John Junker.....who preparing to meet his new "roommate" at Perryville Prison for buying favors in the legislature. http://goldwaterinstitute.org/who-we-are

I think I recall an ASU running back that killed his own teammate a few years ago and is now rotting in prison.

Can you buy/rent tackle there or do you have to bring your own.

Belikin

email from AZSFW -

No one accused him of anything.

Don Peay, the godfather of Sfw is on record as saying that wildlife should be privately owned not public property.

They need to kick ALL lobbiest out of the state. That would diminish the need for a lot of wasted money on all issues. Not just wildlife.

We need to institute a habitat stamp like NM has and all of the money going to the G&F with provisions that the money cannot be used for any general fund items. 100% to wildlife. Between that and the current auction tags, baquets, etc it should be enough for time being. It sucks to pay more but if that is what it takes then so be it. Better for everyone to pay a little than to have a handful of big money guys pay and take controll.

So, it IS a crime for someone to jack with my camera or tree stand even if it is on public property. Thanks for the info.

Yes, I do see a difference, but then again I think baiting bears should be legal. Highly controlled, but legal.

You cannot use anything that can be consumed by bears to lure it in and kill it. interpret it any way you want but in my opinion that includes water and salt.

IMO, yes. If it is indeed salt or another attractant that can be consumed.

thanks!

What they won't tell you is how many lions the govt has to kill at tax payer expense.

Read more: http://www.abc15.com/dpp/news/region_southeast_valley/mesa/mcso-3-arrested-for-planning-to-commit-acts-of-bestiality#ixzz1njE3mNy2