Coues247

2025-Spring-Regulations_240930(1).pdf

I agree but look how many idiots bought their first point last year.

With the new prices, two wyoming points cost almost as much as an AZ hunting/fishing license. Three points and you're already paying $225 for just the points and you dont even have a license. Now throw in points for sheep and moose and you're spending $525 for just points and you still don't have a license. AZ you can buy a $160 license and get points for every species for around $250-$275 and still have the ability to hunt small game and go fishing.

I can't wait until AZ cranks the non resident prices sky high. Every other state is going hog wild on increases for NR except us.

Word on the street is they already got a judge to grant the injunction and stop it.

Did you kill one in 35b?

My brother has the first hunt. Ill let you know how it goes but it sounds like its harder not to kill one of them than to kill one.

$475 is a "ridiculous" price to sell that at. In a good way of course for whoever got that smoking deal.

Have them for sale at 3x or have sold them at 3x? There's a difference. Also have to remember your audience here vs what you might find on ebay.

There's def atleast one up there. It was by Mormon lake on the 11th

https://www.ebay.com/itm/397809524094?_skw=remington+700+short+action+bdl&itmmeta=01KP3FX7ZEXM998D4NR6CB3CE7&hash=item5c9f4b9d7e:g:XJQAAeSwhFFp0-Sm&itmprp=enc%3AAQALAAABADKQclQvzFwZQpmMrsO4LuptNelsXdcB2EFpgzmt8xUd3MavRcDHGXHI%2FnubbcpTyE3nrwUwcyIjce%2BW6l9NhLXxCod%2BF2Wu999IcWILLNvTxGtGu1eeKf9lCA3MRQ%2BzyxqoxkPWBnykTmb7%2FzDSzewfY5wmG%2BiOaxp%2FBmERAjN40sIpfo2yDj7bTf2DMZty4aZGIq%2Fccj3inGcamdv02xzcLkqhhhDleFNNML1dxviJJY4%2ByX1v9so%2Be0CetqB9T3BL8CDiTjlob8%2BMBsYHsfCxLYAwHgSKOwbV0KS%2BPXRnKKgfwAwLsONJzvLvEqsdkUnxkWl33CEbXPukY0H2tQc%3D|tkp%3ABk9SR-b_9O-wZw https://www.gunbroker.com/item/1168004814 Tons of cheap options in synthetic stocks online.

If you read carefully, you can see "I think" " I have no idea what else he posts" and "if" in my post. There are unlimited possibilities as to why they may have wanted to end the relationship. BUT. . Since people were trying to figure out exactly what this guy was meaning in the video, we can use some deduction from the email from Scheels and narrow it down to something to do with his page not being politically neutral. Now IF he only posts stuff about guns and that is the reason they see him as politically UN neutral then that is a place that gun owners should not want to support. IF it's another reason (insert anything you can make up) then that changes things.

Can't let a ruined car ruin a good fishing trip

I think he was trying to get across that Scheel's wasn't going to continue sponsoring him because his channel is "political" meaning supporting guns. And then he showed how that didnt make sense because they have guns all over their website. I have no idea what other stuff he may post but if they are ending any sponsorship because of his channel being about guns that's obviously not the company people should support.

Do you have any contact info?