Jump to content

UggRedBilly

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Content Count

    838

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Posts posted by UggRedBilly

  1. Posted · Report reply

    8 minutes ago, CatfishKev said:

    Unfortunately a few bad apples get the ranchers pissed off. They ignore the signs about gates and leave a bunch of crap behind, I honestly can't blame them for being pissed.  

    I bet a whole lot of people are gonna wish the 1/4 mile rule passed last time around. If i had to choose between the 1/4 mile, a season or a complete ban i would go with the 1/4 mile rule. Hopefully they go with a season and not a complete ban.

    What was the quarter mile rule? Like a quarter mile from water? That would be able and fix the Christmas tree of cameras issues too

  6. Posted · Report reply

    270 is also an option for me too! I see that there is the same number but a different name for different calibers. Like there is 300 Mag. Then I see 300 WSM same with the .270 and the 270 WSM what does that mean exactly? And let's say I get the 270, would that gun shoot normal 270 and the WSM?

  7. Posted · Report reply

    8 minutes ago, Delw said:

    Naw man too light I wanna get draw for something so I can use my 416 rigby. I still havent bought any ammo for it yet last i looked 3 years ago at cabelas it was 140 bucks for 20 rounds, the expensive stuff was almost 200 for 20.

    I do have brass dies powder primers for it just missing bullets.

    Dang that is crazy. I cant imagine paying that much for any bullet

  8. Posted · Report reply

    Just now, NOTAGS said:

    There' several guys on this sight who have killed their bison with the 270 that I know of, one a bull and one a cow.  As I told you about that 243, Dont let anyone tell you its not enough gun.  With  quality  bullets and good shot placement, that 243 of mine has taken several elk to the processor.  None have gone more than 50 yds .  Plus the recoil is a dream.  I love shooting that gun, put a light trigger in it and go kill stuff!

    Yeah it's really great! I can shoot it all day, but with that ammo I got from you I dont wanna ruin that barrel!

  11. Posted · Report reply

    What about a .308? I am a smaller guy so I would hate to start flinching because I am scared of a big kick. I used to do that from shooting a 30-30 at 9 years old and took me until this year to really get myself under controll. Can a .308 kill an animal as big as a cow bison? Is the 30-06 an option too?

    • Like 1

  17. Posted · Report reply

    2 minutes ago, LifeFeedsOnLife said:

    I agree. This is an issue where anyone who enjoys using trail cameras no matter how busy you think you are,  needs to take 10 - 15 minutes out their day to email or call the commission. 

    What is the email I can reach? Can the motion be reversed if enough of is get in contact. I'll email and call

  21. Posted · Report reply

    10 minutes ago, BOHNTR said:

    Why not just prohibit them within a set distance (say 150-200 yards) of any man-made or enhanced water source (guzzler, tanks, improved springs)?  Seems like that would solve a lot of conflict in areas they are a problem. 

    That's a neat idea! Idk how I feel about it l but if you are a good enough hunter you can find the highly trafficked game trail near the water source. And that can easily be enforced! Good thinking!

  23. Posted · Report reply

    1 hour ago, ThomC said:

    Paying someone to hunt for you is not fair chase.  It is no different than lion hunting where dog handlers tree the Lion and call the hunter to the spot and shoot the lion.  Guides are locating the game with cameras and then bringing the shooter to the spot.

    The cunundrum for the Carefree Clowns is they get alot of money from guides and out of state rich guys.   And the state gets money from the other things that the guides and out of state guys buy.  The CC doesnt want to kill the golden egg but wants to keep it a little honest.  So they use the sheep theory and ban everybody not just the guides.  It will be interesting to see what they come up with this time?   😷

    I see what you're saying and I see why it can be frustrating. The fact is that guides bring a lot of value to these animals. If these animals have no value they would not be here today. They need to have a form of value to put on the animal. That value goes to Game and Fish, then game and fish will regulate when and where to hunt. Without game and fish there would be extinct animals across the country. Look at where buffalo's once were. Now look at them today.  Same with turkey, elk and deer

  24. Posted · Report reply

    I dont understand the issue with the cameras though. It allows for more mature bucks to be harvested during the season. Wouldnt that make management better? Yeah those guides have a ton of cameras in those photos but how much country do we have to hunt on? What issue is being fixed in an amazing hunting state?

×