GameHauler

Mountains have Springs. Springs provide water for cultivation.

I'll let you look thru my Pentex 16 binos and that should be all it takes for you to look for something else.

Heck, that's art........doesn't have to be anatomically correct! I think it looks awesome, and Casey.........there can NEVER be too much mass!!!! ("there can NEVER be too much mass!!!!") PM sent

Show off Me Thinks you need to go to Walley World NOW And replace something I gave you. And also give me your GPS to delete a way point

Skyhawk Did you happen to notice the time RR put into your post PS. He only likes a kiss on the right cheek (old Fart, can't turn his head that way for the left cheek ) And I just found out his eyes might be as bad as mine

Yo Da Man Doug We have to try to help the young'ns out Listen? Not sure if they can:unsure:

Thanks Kevin you are right, this is not BS. I was just trying to save Skyhawk some money. If he wants to buy those Binos because thats all he can afford and WANTS to have something NOW, than that is fine. I just stated my thoughts Rimhunter. I may be wrong but I think some day you will buy something better than your Swifts. I REALLY liked my Pentex 10X50's till I got to spend more than a minute behind Swarows. I also stated he did not have to spend $2000.00 but should save his money and get a little better glass. I am not a rich man and I struggle to buy my TOOLS for hunting. I am not trying to show off with this picture but there is a VERY GOOD reason that I have spent the amount of money I did on this GLASS

Kurt, I have not been to the Valley since 04 and that case aint enough to get me to go. Good luck with the sale.

Like I said before. Get the rubbing alcohol out and clean them darts

I wish I knew how it would fit my bow. It looks very bow specific.

Home Depot has trailers

Are you SURE you want to go there??

Young Man Been there, Done that I think you are better off putting that money in the bank. Those Binos will just become hand me downs to your kids and they will hate you for it My $.02 is that you do not have a lot of funds to waste?????????? so save up to get some real glass. I realize you want something NOW I am not saying you need a $2000.00 pair of Swaros just that a $300.00 pair is a waist of money. Hope you listen better than my teenagers

I know why you are a Red Socks fan I will post that latter if you want to continue beating down Jim Youth, Got to Luv it Old fart Jim And older Fart (OOPS) excuse me a minute Ok, I am back with clean shorts. Will have to teach you a lesson, AGAIN if you want to keep this up. Up to you Bud. Jim, when will they learn? He!! "UG" has not even steped into this yet. Your first Photo Shop was Good and we all enjoyed it Ready-set-Go

Yep! Busted, Since you had to resort to that I guess I need to share the picture of you at the baseball game

Jim, as instructed to continue with the investigation It seems that the photo shopper is a little worried He has not left his computer since you revealing his video. I will continue the investigation and keep you updated Mike

Buttered Please

Very nice and well thought out. Not my choice of weapon, but SWEET. Using 223 will allow you to be able to shoot allot more than most of us. Let us know how she preforms this weekend. Thanks for sharing.

At the April 18 Arizona Game & Fish Commission Meeting, the Commission agreed 5-0 to support proposed amendments to HR 3287, the Tumacacori Highlands Wilderness Act. As many of you will recall, Congressman Grijalva (D) Arizona Congressional District 7, introduced HR 3287 on August 1, 2007. Since that time a great deal of debate has occurred over the merits of creating another wilderness area in Arizona. The Arizona Game & Fish Department (AGFD) is on record stating its concerns about the Tumacacori Highlands proposed wilderness designation. AGFD made it clear in a letter to Senator John McCain in June 2005, that creation of additional wilderness areas in the state are not in the best interest of wildlife and encouraged alternative management allocations other than a Wilderness designation. In the letter the former director of AGFD Duane Shroufe said " ... it is our experience that wilderness designation will not ensure the continued well being of fish and wildlife populations nor eliminate the impacts that outside factors will have on fish and wildlife resources in the Tumacacori Highlands. Instead, it will unnecessarily limit the resource agencies' ability to proactively address and mitigate these impacts." The letter and accompanying attachment provided a a long list of issues the AGFD has experienced over the years in managing fish and wildlife in wilderness areas - none of which are beneficial to Arizona's wildlife resource. In a recent issue of NRA's American Hunter magazine Darren LaSorte authored an article "Too Much of a Good Thing" about this very issue. Mr. LaSorte is NRA-ILA Manager for Hunting Policy. His article is right on point about the pitfalls of wilderness designations. He cites how wilderness takes a toll on wildlife by prohibiting state game agencies from conducting the most basic of wildlife management practices in Wilderness areas and goes on to say" Arizona's bighorn sheep population has been an unfortunate victim." "With this recent action the Commission really lost an opportunity to parlay their support for some real meaningful reforms in the prohibitive and litigious manner in which wilderness is errantly administered in Arizona and to assert that wildlife management activities are allowed and not prohibited in wilderness" noted Brian Dolan of Tucson. "The Commission basically voted to support another island of no active wildlife management and restricted access in Arizona in exchange for a politician's promise to attend to a problem he doesn't fully understand or appreciate" Larry Audsley, President of Southern Arizona Sportsmen's Alliance, agrees saying that "the Commissioners are telling themselves they got the best deal they could get but the proposed language will only increase the stranglehold wilderness law already has on wildlife management. I'll always believe the Commissioners could have fixed the bill or killed it, if only they would have had the will to do so." Jonny Fugate of the Yuma Valley Rod and Gun Club expressed disappointment in the Commission's action, but was unavailable for a more detailed comment as he is on a turkey hunt in New Mexico. So why did the Commission agree to supporting HR 3287 without a commitment from the bill sponsor to address the four concerns previously identified at the September 7, 2007 Commission meeting? One can only speculate as the decision, at least from the sportsmen's perspective, is not in the best interest of wildlife. Perhaps the Commission thought it was the best they could do and that some change was better than nothing. Perhaps some of the Commission members let their philosophical bent and support of wilderness designations overshadow their good judgement as to what is best for wildlife. Perhaps the political pressure from environmental activists made it too difficult and some members felt they had to bow to being "politically correct". It's easy to say" they should have done this" or "I would have done that" but if you have ever served on an elected or appointed Board, you know some decisions are not easy. Don't get me wrong, I am not apologizing for the Commission or condoning their action. Sometimes you just have to take the road less traveled and stand up for what you know in your heart is the right decision. I don't think the Commission did that. I believe they rationalized a decision that in the end will not bring about a solution to wilderness management issues, but it will give at least one Arizona Congressman a backdrop and support for creating one more wilderness in Arizona. In the end, the Commission should have done the right thing for wildlife. It is their duty and their mission to maintain and enhance wildlife populations. I for one think they fell short on this mandate. For a copy of the AGFD June 5 letter to Senator Mc Cain http://www.arizonasportsmenforwildlife.org...to%20McCain.pdf

Must Have a Taco Bell there

I remember a while back someone saying something about someone on here working for Reese. Could the Cequent Rep please raise their hand. Thanks

Thanks Griz. Been to Hershey, I have been in better smelling towns. Grew up in Clarion.

"I know it wasn't Amanda this was a candy apple red Jeep and I don't think it was Gino but its always possible. Hey Gino where were you opening day of the first late hunt in 22N?" If he was smart he was under his covers. That day was not fit for anyone to be out. "Taco bell RULES" I already knew you didn't have any taste

YOU CHEAP $.02 HUSSY How could you visit any other Site Any way, When I click on the link I can see the post for about 2 seconds and then only your cheap reply Any ideas why? Yeah.... Scroll up..... Man, I know lots of people cant keep up with technology, but man thats lame! Aint nut'n thar but the friging Cheva ad that I pray Amanda never gots ta duz