Snapshot

I will stay home before I vote for Jeb Bush. Rand Paul and Ted Cruz would be great combo.

Never give a redneck a 12 pack and a flamethrower

your arctic cat has a vacuum pump, and not a true fuel pump like an EFI uses. It helps pull fuel under vacuum,when the engine is running. Trace the fuel line from the petcock to the vacuum pump to find it. it could be plugged or bad. My Sportsman has a vacuum pump. looks like this

some fuel filters are directional. see if the filter has an arrow, and is pointing towards the carb. If no fuel is filling the floatbowl, that means there is a blockage, or a float problem. Does your carb have a sight glass, or a screw on the side of the bowl where you can identify fuel level?

I think I will change my answer also. Since this is an Arizona waterhole, it must be a giant herd of "Trail cameras"

The float needle seat or hole could have a small piece of debris in it? the carb would have to be pulled and the float bowl removed to check it.

Buffalo?

caburated models are usually gravity fed, and don't require a fuel pump.if it is a carb problem, did you check the float needle for blockage and float level? check the overflow lines, and, or breather lines for blockage. they can sometimes cause a vacuum lock if plugged. check the throttle cable adjustments also. it could be an ignition issue ?

I just received a "Presidential Primary ballot' in the mail from the RNC. It is nothing more than a questionnaire, and solicitation for money. It stated that if I could not make a donation, could I please send $15 to cover the processing of the questionnaire. WTF?

Willie, as I said, the game is rigged. It takes big money and support to win a Presidential election. Who do you think has all that money and control.?

The game is rigged. The establishment RINO's in the GOP are the problem. Without unity in the party, and a strong candidate that the RNC can rally around, we will lose the election to Hillary. The RINO's hate Ted Cruz, and Rand Paul. Hillary is the only recognizable name on the left side of the fence. Eliziibeth Warren would be worse than Hillary, IMO. Right now the GOP is it's own worst enemy.

Back in the late 1980's, I built all the booth seating, table tops, waitress stations, etc..,for both Mi Nidito, and El Minuto. In 1999, Bill Clinton was in town, and decided Mi Nidito would be his lunch stop. I happened to be doing some work across the street at the time. They had 3 or 4 blocks closed off with police, swat team, Secret Service, helicopters. We stood out on the sidewalk, and watched the media circus as D- Bag Bill talked to his south side constituents, and went into Mi Nidito with his entourage for lunch.

I agree, driving the 101 into Scottsdale its like somebody hit the idiot switch. If you think AZ has bad drivers, you'd need to don diapers if you want to drive in the Philippines. And the traffic cops will pull you over and shake you down for driving while white. Everyone in the Phil's will try and part the white guy from his money. A foreigner is a walking ATM.

I would love to see technology that deactivates cell phone texting and internet, while the phone is in a automobile. voice calls only.

I feel you. I yelled at a woman yesterday that was weaving all over the road, and doing 25mph in a 45 zone. playing on her phone. She flipped me off, and I was ready to shed my human form, and go NASCAR on her sorry butt. Rubbing is racing.

Certainly not the best, but pretty good, Casa Molina and the killer Margarita's.

The Liberal media is just as mentally ill as Jenner.

June 7, 2015 8:15 am Second Amendment (Washington Examiner) – Commonly used and unregulated internet discussions and videos about guns and ammo could be closed down under rules proposed by the State Department, amounting to a “gag order on firearm-related speech,” the National Rifle Association is warning. In updating regulations governing international arms sales, State is demanding that anyone who puts technical details about arms and ammo on the web first get the OK from the federal government — or face a fine of up to $1 million and 20 years in jail. According to the NRA, that would include blogs and web forums discussing technical details of common guns and ammunition, the type of info gun owners and ammo reloaders trade all the time. “Gunsmiths, manufacturers, reloaders, and do-it-yourselfers could all find themselves muzzled under the rule and unable to distribute or obtain the information they rely on to conduct these activities,” said the NRA in a blog posting. “This latest regulatory assault, published in the June 3 issue of the Federal Register, is as much an affront to the First Amendment as it is to the Second,” warned the NRA’s lobbying shop. “Your action is urgently needed to ensure that online blogs, videos, and web forums devoted to the technical aspects of firearms and ammunition do not become subject to prior review by State Department bureaucrats before they can be published,” it added. At issue is the internet. State is updating International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR), which implement the federal Arms Export Control Act (AECA). The rules govern everything from guns to strategic bombers. The NRA said that the rules predate the internet, and now the federal government wants to regulate technical arms discussions on on the internationally available web. State’s proposal is highly technical. It took 14 pages in the Federal Register to explain. But the NRA boiled it down for gun owners with this warning: “In their current form, the ITAR do not (as a rule) regulate technical data that are in what the regulations call the ‘public domain.’ Essentially, this means data ‘which is published and which is generally accessible or available to the public’ through a variety of specified means. These include ‘at libraries open to the public or from which the public can obtain documents.’ Many have read this provision to include material that is posted on publicly available websites, since most public libraries these days make Internet access available to their patrons. “The ITAR, however, were originally promulgated in the days before the Internet. Some State Department officials now insist that anything published online in a generally-accessible location has essentially been ‘exported,’ as it would be accessible to foreign nationals both in the U.S. and overseas. “With the new proposal published on June 3, the State Department claims to be ‘clarifying’ the rules concerning ‘technical data’ posted online or otherwise ‘released’ into the ‘public domain.’ To the contrary, however, the proposal would institute a massive new prior restraint on free speech. This is because all such releases would require the ‘authorization’ of the government before they occurred. The cumbersome and time-consuming process of obtaining such authorizations, moreover, would make online communication about certain technical aspects of firearms and ammunition essentially impossible.” Below are the State changes drawing the NRA fire: Paragraph ( of the revised definition explicitly sets forth the Department’s requirement of authorization to release information into the ”public domain.” Prior to making available ”technical data” or software subject to the ITAR, the U.S. government must approve the release through one of the following: (1) The Department; (2) the Department of Defense’s Office of Security Review; (3) a relevant U.S. government contracting authority with authority to allow the ”technical data” or software to be made available to the public, if one exists; or (4) another U.S. government official with authority to allow the ”technical data” or software to be made available to the public. The requirements of paragraph ( are not new. Rather, they are a more explicit statement of the ITAR’s requirement that one must seek and receive a license or other authorization from the Department or other cognizant U.S. government authority to release ITAR controlled ”technical data,” as defined in § 120.10. A release of ”technical data” may occur by disseminating ”technical data” at a public conference or trade show, publishing ”technical data” in a book or journal article, or posting ”technical data” to the Internet. This proposed provision will enhance compliance with the ITAR by clarifying that ”technical data” may not be made available to the public without authorization. Persons who intend to discuss ”technical data” at a conference or trade show, or to publish it, must ensure that they obtain the appropriate authorization.

Who need's Congress to make law, when Obama makes up his own without them.

Email the following by August 3rd, to voice your opinion. Not that Obama cares about our opinion, but our voice can be heard by those who can stop this. Public comments on the proposed changes to ITAR will be accepted until August 3, 2015. You can submit those comments at regulations.gov or e-mail them to DDTCPublicComments@state.gov with the subject line indicating the comments concern the ‘‘ITAR Amendment—Revisions to Definitions; Data Transmission and Storage.”

We have been in recession for the last 7 years. Don't believe the media, or the man behind the curtain. What's coming is much worse. I need to learn how to bet on horses

Pretty much! The Left knows that they can't take away guns directly, so they do everything they can to chip away at the edges. We will see many bad executive orders, and regulations, over the next 18 months.

That's what happens down on the rancheros. But seriously, it's tough watching any program with that 2nd amendment, panty wetter. Bob Costas. Bob sold his man-sack to the left

Only in Liberal Loonyland, would a Chick with a dick, be praised for courage by the President of the USA. We have come a, long sad way, since I saw an Olympic icon on the side of a Wheaties box turn itself into an abomination.